The New Work of Composing


mothers and daughters of digital invention

        history stanley digital creation digital dangers ip resistance conclusions introduction
sidebar image  


REFERENCES

Balsamo, Anne. (1996). Technologies of the gendered body: Reading cyborg women. Durham: Duke University Press.

Besser, Howard. (2001). The next digital divides. Teaching to Change LA, 1(2). Retrieved October 20, 2007, from http://www.tcla.gseis.ucla.edu/divide/politics/besser.html

Blair, Kris, & Tulley, Christine. (2007). Whose research is it, anyway? The challenge of deploying feminist methodology in technological spaces. In Heidi A. McKee & Dànielle Nicole DeVoss (Eds.), Digital writing research: Technologies, methodologies and ethical issues (pp. 303-317). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Chabaud-Rychter, Danielle. (1995). The configuration of domestic practices in the designing of household appliances. In Keith Grint & Rosalind Gill (Eds.), The gender-technology relation: Contemporary theory & research (pp. 95-111). Bristol: Taylor & Francis Ltd.

Cleeland, Brenton (sesh00). (2007, May 27). Dump your pen friend [Photograph]. Flickr.com. Retrieved from http://www.flickr.com/photos/sesh00/515961023/

Cockburn, Cynthia, & Fürst-Dilić, Ruža. (1994). Introduction: Looking for the gender/technology relation. In Cynthia Cockburn & Ruza Fürst-Dilić (Eds.), Bringing technology home: Gender and technology in a changing Europe (pp. 1-21). Buckingham: Open University Press.

Dell computers [Advertisement]. (2001). Your thoughts exactly (Dell4Me television ad campaign).

Dell launches new consumer advertising campaign. (1999, September 22). Lexdon: The Business Library. Retrieved from http://www.lexdon.com/article/dell_launches_new_consumer_advertising/130451.html

DeVoss, Dànielle. (2002). Women’s porn sites—Spaces of fissure and eruption or “I’m a little bit of everything.” Sexuality & Culture, 6(3), 75-94.

DeVoss, Dànielle Nicole. (2007). From the BBS to the Web: Tracing the spaces of online romance. In Monica T. Whitty, Andrea J. Baker & James A. Inman (Eds.), Online matchmaking (pp. 17-30). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

DeVoss, Dànielle Nicole. (2008). Formidable females: Pink-collar workplaces, computers, and cultures of resistance. In Kristine Blair, Radhika Gajjala, & Christine Tulley (Eds.), Webbing cyberfeminist practice: Communities, pedagogies, and social action (pp. 345-384). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Durack, Katherine T. (1997). Gender, technology, and the history of technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 6(3), 249-260.

Giordano, R. (1988). From the frontier to the border: Women in data processing, 1940-1959. Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the British Society for the History of Science and the History of Science Society (pp. 357-364). Manchester, UK.

Gosling, Ju. (1998). My not-so-secret life as a cyborg. Retrieved February 2, 2009, from http://users.netmatters.co.uk/ju90/cylife.htm

Halbert, Debora. (2006). Feminist interpretations of intellectual property. Journal of Gender, Social Policy, & the Law, 14(3), 431-460.

Lenhart, Amanda, & Mary Madden. (2007, January 3). Social networking websites and teens: An overview. Pew Internet Project Data Memo. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_SNS_Data_Memo_Jan_2007.pdf.pdf

Lenhart, Amanda, Purcell, Kristen, Smith, Aaron, & Zickuhr, Kathryn. (2010, February 3). Social media and mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. Pew Internet & American Life Report. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Social_Media_and_Young_ Adults_Report_Final_with_toplines.pdf

Lenz, Stephanie. (2007, February 7). Let's Go Crazy #1 [Video file]. Retrieved from http://youtube.com/watch?v=N1KfJHFWlhQ

Lenz v. Universal. (n.d.). Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.eff.org/cases/lenz-v-universal

Let's go crazy #1 [Comment thread]. (2007, February 7). Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=N1KfJHFWlhQ

Miles, Stephanie. (1999, August 3). Mattel dolls up PCs with Barbie, Hot Wheels touches. CNET News. Retrieved from http://news.cnet.com/2100-1040-229387.html

Pollack, Malla. (2006). Towards a feminist theory of the public domain, or rejecting the gendered scope of United States copyrightable and patentable subject matter. William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 12(3), 603-626.

Rampell, Catherine. (2007, October 19). Standing up to takedown notices. The Washington Post Online. Retrieved January 10, 2009, from
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/18/AR2007101802453.html

Stanley, Autumn. (1995). Mothers and daughters of invention: Notes for a revised history of technology. New York: Rutgers University Press.

Tamblyn, Christine. (1995). "She loves it, she loves it not: Women and technology," an interactive CD-ROM. Leonardo, 28(2), 99-104.

Tamblyn, Christine. (1997). She loves it, she loves it not: Women and technology. In Jennifer Terry & Melodie Calvert (Eds.). Processed lives: Gender and technology in everyday life (pp. 47-50). New York, Routledge.

Yen, Alfred. (2007, August 2). NFL, Professor Seltzer and the DMCA. Madisonian.net: A Blog about Law, Technology, and Culture. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http://madisonian.net/2007/08/02/nfl-professor-seltzer-and-the-dmca/

FURTHER READING

I have rather artificially separated these suggested readings into three chunks: historical (which includes general analyses, research into, and critique of women and technology writ broadly), digital / networked (which moves into analyses, research, and critique of women’s work, interactions, and negotiations within networked spaces), and intellectual property.

Historical

Aschauer, Ann Brady. (1999). Tinkering with technological skill: An examination of the gendered uses of technologies. Computers and Composition, 16(1), 7-24.

Benston, Margaret Lowe. (1988). Women’s voices/men’s voices: Technology as language. In Cheris Kramarae (Ed.), Technology and women’s voices: Keeping in touch (pp. 15-28). New York: Routledge.

Cockburn, Cynthia. (1988). Machinery of dominance: Women, men and technical know-how. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

Cockburn, Cynthia. (1989). Sexual division of technology: The same again or different? In Kea Tijdens et al. (Eds.), Women, work and computerization: Forming new alliances (pp. 249-253). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Cowan, Ruth Schwartz. (1985). More work for mother: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. New York: Basic Books.

Faulkner, Wendy, & Arnold, Erik. (Eds.). (1985). Smothered by invention: Gender and technology in women’s lives. London: Pluto Press.

Gill, Kirkup, & Smith Keller, Laurie. (Eds). (1992). Inventing women: Science, technology and gender. London: Polity Press.

Green, Eileen, Owen, Jenny, & Pain, Den. (Eds.). (1993). Gendered by design? Information technology and office systems. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.

Grint, Keith, & Gill, Rosalind. (Eds.). (1995). The gender–technology relation: Contemporary theory & research. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.

Jansen, Sue Curry. (1989). Gender and the information society: A socially structured silence. Journal of Communication, 39(3), 196-215.

Jellison, Katherine. (1993). Entitled to power: Farm women and technology, 1913-1963. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Kramarae, Cheris. (Ed). (1988). Technology and women’s voices: Keeping in touch. New York: Routledge.

Kramer, Pamela E., & Lehman, Sheila. (1990). Mismeasuring women: A critique of research on computer ability and avoidance. Signs, 16(1), 158-172.

Lie, Merete. (1995). Technology and masculinity: The case of the computer. The European Journal of Women’s Studies, 2, 379-394.

Perry, Ruth, & Greber, Lisa. (1990). Women and computers: An introduction. Signs, 16(1), 74-101.

Ravetz, Alison. (1987). Housework and domestic technologies: An essay review. In Maureen McNeil (Ed)., Gender and expertise (pp. 198-208). London: Free Association Books.

Ray, Ruth, & Barton, Ellen. (1991). Technology and authority. In Gail E. Hawisher & Cynthia L. Selfe (Eds.), Evolving perspectives on computers and composition studies: Questions for the 1990s (pp. 279-299). Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.

Stabile, Carole A. (1994). Feminism and the technological fix. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Turkle, Sherry. (1988). Computational reticence: Why women fear the intimate machine. In Cheris Kramarae (Ed.), Technology and women’s voices: Keeping in touch (pp. 40-61). New York: Routledge.

Wajcman, Judy. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.

Webster, Juliet. (1996). Shaping women’s work: Gender, employment and information technology. New York: Longman.

Digital / Networked

Blair, Kristine, & Takayoshi, Pamela. (Eds.). (1999). Feminist cyberscapes: Mapping gendered academic spaces. Stamford, CT: Ablex.

Braidotti, Rosi. (1991). Patterns of dissonance: A Study of Women in Contemporary Philosophy. New York: Routledge.

Braidotti, Rosi. (1998). Cyberfeminism with a difference. Retrieved October 17, 2007, from http://www.let.uu.nl/womens_studies/rosi/cyberfem.htm#bfn16

Brail, Stephanie. (1996). The price of admission: Harassment and free speech in the wild, wild west. In Lynn Cherny & Elizabeth Reba Weise (Eds.), Wired women: Gender and new realities in cyberspace (pp. 141-157). Seattle: Seal Press.

Coyle, Karen. (1996). How hard can it be? In Lynn Cherny & Elizabeth Reba Weise (Eds.), Wired women: Gender and new realities in cyberspace (pp. 42-55). Seattle: Seal Press.

Fernandez, Maria, Wilding, Faith, & Wright, Michelle M. (Eds.). (2003). Domain errors!: Cyberfeminist practices. New York: Autonomedia.

Grigar, Dene. (1999). Over the line, online, gender lines: E-mail and women in the classroom. In Kristine Blair & Pamela Takayoshi (Eds.), Feminist cyberscapes: Mapping gendered academic spaces. (pp. 257-281). Stamford, CT: Ablex.

Hawisher, Gail E., & Sullivan, Patricia. (1998). Women on the networks: Searching for e-spaces of their own. In Susan C. Jarratt & Lynn Worsham (Eds.), Feminism and composition studies: In other words (pp. 172-197). New York: MLA.

Hawisher, Gail E., & Sullivan, Patricia A. (1999). Fleeting images: Women visually writing the Web. In Gail E. Hawisher & Cynthia L. Selfe (Eds.), Passions, pedagogies and 21st century technologies (pp. 268-291). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

Herring, Susan, Johnson, Deborah A., & DiBenedetto, Tamra. (1995). “This discussion is going too far!”: Male resistance to female participation on the Internet. In Kira Hall & Mary Bucholtz (Eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 67-96). New York: Routledge.

Hocks, Mary. (1999). Feminist interventions in electronic environments. Computers and Composition, 16(1), 107-119.

LeCourt, Donna, & Barnes, Luann. (1999). Writing multiplicity: Hypertext and feminist textual politics. Computers and Composition, 16(1), 55-71.

Reiche, Claudia, & Kuni, Verena. (Eds.). (2004). Cyberfeminism: Next protocols. New York: Autonomedia.

Rickly, Rebecca. (1999). The gender gap in computers and composition research: Must boys be boys? Computers and Composition, 16(1), 121-140.

Shade, Leslie Regan. (1994). Gender issues in computer networking. In Alison Adam et al. (Eds.), Women, work and computerization: Breaking old boundaries, building new forms (pp. 91-105). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Sullivan, Laura L. (1997). Cyberbabes: (Self-) representation of women and the virtual (male) gaze. Computers and Composition, 14(2), 189-204.

Sullivan, Laura L. (1999). Wired women writing: Towards a feminist theorization of hypertext. Computers and Composition, 16(1), 25-54.

Takayoshi, Pamela. (2000). Complicated women: Examining methodologies for understanding the uses of technology. Computers and Composition, 17(2), 123-138.

Takayoshi, Pamela, Huot, Emily, & Huot, Meghan. (1999). No boys allowed: The World Wide Web as a clubhouse for girls. Computers and Composition, 16(1), 89-106.

Ullman, Ellen. (1996). Come in, CQ: The body of the wire. In Lynn Cherny & Elizabeth Reba Weise (Eds.), Wired women: Gender and new realities in cyberspace (pp. 3-23). Seattle: Seal Press.

Wajcman, Judy. (2004). TechnoFeminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Intellectual Property

Aoki, Keith, Boyle, James, & Jenkins, Jennifer. (2005). Tales from the public domain: Bound by law? Duke Center for the Study of the Public Domain. Retrieved from http://www.law.duke.edu/cspd/comics/

Copywrite, plagiarism, and intellectual property: Special issue. (1998). Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 3(1). Retrieved January 10, 2006, from http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/3.1/index.html

DeVoss, Dànielle Nicole, & Porter, James E. (2006). Why Napster matters to writing: Filesharing as a new ethic of digital delivery. Computers and Composition, 23, 178-210.

Gurak, Laura J., & Johnson-Eilola, Johndan. (1998). Special issue: Intellectual property. Computers and Composition, 15(2).

Lessig, Lawrence. (2000). Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.

Lessig, Lawrence. (2001). The future of ideas: The fate of the commons in a connected world. New York: Random House.

Lessig, Lawrence. (2004). Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. New York: Penguin Press.

Litman, Jessica. (2001). Digital copyright: Protecting intellectual property on the Internet. New York: Prometheus Books.

Lunsford, Andrea A., & West, Susan. (1996). Intellectual property and composition studies. College Composition and Communication, 47(3), 383-411.

Manovich, Lev. (2002). Who is the author?: Sampling / remixing / open source [Microsoft Word document]. Retrieved December 30, 2005, from http://www.manovich.net/DOCS/models_of_authorship.doc

Manovich, Lev. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge: MIT Press.

McLeod, Kembrew. (2007). Freedom of Expression: Resistance and Repression in the Age of Intellectual Property. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Negativland. (n.d.). Changing copyright. Negativworldwidewebland! Retrieved from http://www.negativland.com/news/?page_id=22

Negativland. (n.d.). Negativland's tenets of free appropriation. Negativworldwidewebland! Retrieved from http://www.negativland.com/news/?page_id=10

Rife, Martine C. (2007). The fair use doctrine: History, application, implications for (new media) writing teachers. Computers and Composition, 24(1), 154-178.

Vaidhyanathan, Siva. (2003). Copyrights and copywrongs: The rise of intellectual property and how it threatens creativity. New York: New York University Press.

Vaidhyanathan, Siva. (2004). The state of copyright activism. First Monday, 9(4). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1133/1053

Webb, Suzanne, & DeVoss, Dànielle Nicole. (2008). Grand theft audio: Negotiating copyright as composers. Computers and Composition, 25(1), 79-103.

Westbrook, Steve. (2006). Visual rhetoric in a culture of fear: Impediments to multimedia production. College English, 68(5), 457-480.

 

 

index | introduction | history | stanley | digital(creation) |
digital(dangers)
| ip resistance | conclusions | bibliography

 
   

dànielle nicole devoss | devossda@msu.edu

 

 

Dànielle Nicole DeVoss
Michigan State University

 

index introduction history stanley digital conclusions