The New Work of Composing

 
top header

NYMA:

Mother Always Said

Left glyph
Right glyph
 
 

Working within invitational rhetoric for a moment, let’s reframe this context. Can we say, then, that sharing, cooperation, and loyalty are not personal sacrifices but rather indications of willingness to connect, invitations to converse? If these actions create spaces for conversation, are they then worth the effort?


Sonja K. Foss and Karen A. Foss (2009) suggest that “individuals decide to make a change and deliberately use their thinking processes to achieve the desired result—[and] the results...impact the systems of which they are a part” (p. 55). Thus, reconsidering the ways in which we see to connect, even if they seem unconventional and distinct from the norms of academic discourse, can help us change the ways our communications are perceived and received.


If under invitational rhetoric such actions are no longer a sacrifice, will we not make greater progress toward communication and satisfaction in that communicative process?


 

“Many women refuse to leave commitment, sharing, cooperation, material and emotional obligation, personal loyalty, and a willingness to sacrifice for others at home. They transport these qualities into the workplace.” (Ilene Philipson, 2002, p. 1)

Monday, February 22, 2010

Two jellyfish
straight line
straight line

A willingness to sacrifice