References
Please note this references list was compiled prior to the updated 7th edition of the APA manual. Entries follow 6th edition.
Adams, Susan. (2019, March). Meet the English professor creating the billion-dollar college of the future. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2019/03/28/meet-the-english-professor-creating-the-billion-dollar-college-of-the-future/
Allen, Nancy. (2002a). Relationships between words and images: An overview. In Nancy Allen (Ed.), Working with words and images: New steps in an old dance (pp. 1–22). Westport, CT: Ablex.
———. (Ed). (2002b). Working with words and images: New steps in an old dance. Westport, CT: Ablex.
Allington, Daniel, Brouillette, Sarah, & Golumbia, David. (2016). Neoliberal tools (and archives): A political history of digital humanities. Los Angeles Review of Books. Retrieved from https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/neoliberal-tools-archives-political-history-digital-humanities/#!
Amidon, Timothy R., & Reyman, Jessica. (2015). Authorship and ownership of user contributions on the social web. In Dànielle Nicole DeVoss & Martine Courant Rife (Eds.), Cultures of Copyright (pp. 108–124). New York: Peter Lang.
Amore, Paul, et al. (1998). Copywrite, plagiarism, and intellectual property. Special issue of Kairos, 3(1). http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/3.1/index.html
Anderson, Steve, & McPherson, Tara. (2011). Engaging digital scholarship: Thoughts on evaluating multimedia scholarship. Profession, 136–151. Retrieved from https://www.mlajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1632/prof.2011.2011.1.136
Anson, Chris M. (1999). Distant voices: Teaching and writing in a culture of technology. College English, 61(3), 261–280.
———. (2014). Process pedagogy and its legacy. In Gary Tate, Amy Rupiper Taggart, Kurt Schick, & H. Brooke Hessler (Eds.), A guide to composition pedagogies (2nd ed.) (pp. 212–230). New York: Oxford University Press.
Argaez, Enrique de. (2005, July). Internet growth 2000–2005. Internet World Stats News, 8. Retrieved October 30, 2019, from https://www.internetworldstats.com/pr/edi008.htm
Arola, Kristin L. (2010). The design of web 2.0: The rise of the template, the fall of design. Computers and Composition, 27, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.004
Ball, Cheryl E. (2015, February 5). The asymptotic relationship between digital humanities and computers and writing. Paper presented at Emory University Writing Program speaker series, Atlanta, GA. Retrieved from http://ceball.com/2016/10/24/2315/
———. (2014). Logging on: News from the MLA convention. Kairos, 18(2). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/14.2/loggingon/index.html
———. (2010a). Logging on: Kairos at MLA and abroad. Kairos, 14(2). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/14.2/loggingon/index.html
———. (2010b). Logging on: Kairos at MLA and abroad. Kairos, 15(1). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/15.1/loggingon/index.html
———. (2004). Show, not tell: The value of new media scholarship. Computers and Composition, 21, 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.08.001
Ball, Cheryl E., & Moeller, Ryan M. (2008). Covering the ASS[umptions] between U and ME; or how new media can bridge a scholarly/creative split in English studies. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved from www.bgsu.edu/cconline/convergence/
Balzhiser, Deborah, Grover, Mandy, Lauer, Evelyn, McNeely, Sarah, Polk, Jonathan D., Zmikly, Jon, Holmes, Cade, Porter, Ellen, Saucier, Corey, & Swearingen, Tiffany. (2011). The Facebook papers. Kairos, 16(1). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/16.1/praxis/balzhiser-et-al/index.html
Banks, Adam J. (2011). Digital griots: African American rhetoric in a multimedia age. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
———. (2006). Race, rhetoric, and technology: Searching for higher ground. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Baron, Dennis. (1999). From pencils to pixels: The stages of literacy technologies. In Gail E. Hawisher & Cynthia L. Selfe (Eds.), Passions, pedagogies, and 21st century technologies (pp. 15–33). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs/119
Barrett, Brian. (2019, August 4). The radical transformation of the textbook. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/digital-textbooks-radical-transformation/
Barton, Matthew D. (2005). The future of rational-critical debate in online public spheres. Computers and Composition, 22, 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2005.02.002
Bauer, Holly, Brown, Johel, Kelly, Amy, Kyburz, Bonnie, Lewiecki-Wilson, Cindy, Parrish, Juli, & Simmonds, Kurt. (1997). Recent books. College Composition and Communication, 48(4), 585–586.
Beck, Estee. (2013). Reflecting upon the past, sitting with the present, and charting our future: Gail Hawisher and Cynthia Selfe discussing the community of computers & composition. Computers and Composition, 30, 349–357, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2013.10.007
Berlin, James A. (1982). Contemporary composition: The major pedagogical theories. College English, 44(8), 765–777.
———. (1987). Rhetoric and reality: Writing instruction in American colleges, 1900–1985. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Bizzell, Patricia. (1993). Academic discourse and critical consciousness. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Blakesley, David, & Brooke, Collin. (Eds.). (2001). Visual rhetoric. Special issue of Enculturation: A Journal for Rhetoric, Writing, and Culture, 3(2). Retrieved from http://enculturation.gmu.edu/3_2/
Blair, Kristine L., & Monske, Elizabeth. (2003). Cui bono?: Revisiting the promises and perils of online learning. Computers and Composition, 20, 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2003.08.016
Blythe, Stuart. (2001). Designing online courses: User-centered practices. Computers and Composition, 18, 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(01)00066-4
Bolter, Jay David. (2001). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print. (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Bolter, Jay David, & Grusin, Richard. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bradley, Linda. (2014). Peer-reviewing in an intercultural wiki environment - student interaction and reflections. Computers and Composition, 34, 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2014.09.008
Braine, George. (2001). A study of English as a foreign language (EFL) writers on a local-area network (LAN) and in traditional classes. Computers and Composition, 18, 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(01)00056-1
A brief history of Computers and Composition. (n.d.). Computers and Composition blog. Retrieved from http://candcblog.org/computersandcomposition/html/history.htm
Brooke, Collin Gifford. (2009). Lingua fracta: Towards a rhetoric of new media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
———. (2014). New media pedagogy. In Gary Tate, Amy Rupiper Taggart, Kurt Schick, & H. Brooke Hessler (Eds.), A guide to composition pedagogies (2nd ed.) (pp. 177–193). New York: Oxford University Press.
Brooke, Collin Gifford, Gossett, Kathie, Potts, Liza, McDuffie, Kristi, Warnick, Quinn, Laquintano, Timothy, & Walls, Douglas. (2016, May). From methods to resistance: Digital writing scholars crossing into digital humanities classrooms. Paper presented at the Computers and Writing Conference, Rochester, NY.
Brown, Jr., James B. (2015a). Ethical programs: Hospitality and the rhetoric of software. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
———. (2015b). Crossing state lines: Rhetoric and software studies. In Jim Ridolfo & William Hart-Davidson (Eds.), Rhetoric and the digital humanities (pp. 20-32). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Buck, Amber. (2008). The invisible interface: MS Word in the writing center. Computers and Composition, 25(4), 396-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2008.05.003
Buck, Elisabeth. (2015). Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter—Oh my!: Assessing the efficacy of the rhetorical composing situation with FYC students as advanced social media practitioners. Kairos, 19(3). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/19.3/praxis/buck/index.html
Burnham, Chris, & Powell, Rebecca. (2014). Expressive pedagogy. In Gary Tate, Amy Rupiper Taggart, Kurt Schick, & H. Brooke Hessler (Eds.), A guide to composition pedagogies (2nd ed.) (pp. 111–127). New York: Oxford University Press.
Butler, Janine, Cirio, Joseph, Del Hierro, Victor, Gonzales, Laura, Robinson, Joy, & Haas, Angela. (2017). Caring for the future: Initiatives for further inclusion in computers and writing. Kairos, 22(1). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/22.1/disputatio/butler-et-al/index.html
Call for interventions. (2019). Practicing digital activisms: Computers and Writing 2020. Retrieved from https://candwcon.org/2020/
Capitalization of “Internet.” (2017, June 17). Wikipedia. Retrieved June 17, 2017, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalization_of_%22Internet%22
Carr, Tony, Morrison, Andrew, Cox, Glenda, & Deacon, Andrew. (2007). Weathering wikis: Net-based learning meets political science in a South African university. Computers and Composition, 24, 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2007.06.001
CCCC Committee for Best Practices in Online Writing Instruction. (2013). A position statement of principles and example effective practices for online writing instruction (OWI). Retrieved from https://cccc.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/owiprinciples
Chachra, Debbie. (2015, January 23). Why I am not a maker. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/01/why-i-am-not-a-maker/384767/
Chang, Ching-Fen. (2012). Peer review via three modes in an EFL writing course, Computers and Composition, 29, 63–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2012.01.001
Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. (2013, January). The dark side of digital humanities—Part 1. Center for 21st Century Studies, 9. Retrieved from https://www.c21uwm.com/2013/01/09/the-dark-side-of-the-digital-humanities-part-1/
Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong, Grusin, Richard, Jagoda, Patrick, & Raley, Rita. (2016). The dark side of the digital humanities. In Matthew K. Gould & Lauren F. Klein (Eds.), Debates in the digital humanities, 2nd ed. (pp. 493–509). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Cohen, Patricia. (2010, November 16). Digital keys for unlocking the humanities’ riches. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/17/arts/17digital.html
College students are more diverse than ever. Faculty and administrators are not. (2019, March). AAC&U News. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/aacu-news/newsletter/2019/march/facts-figures
Coogan, David. (1995). E-mail tutoring, a new way to do new work. Computers and Composition, 12, 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/8755-4615(95)90005-5
Cope, Bill, & Kalantzis, Mary. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. New York: Routledge.
Council of Writing Program Administrators, National Council of Teachers of English, & National Writing Project. (2011). Framework for success in postsecondary writing. Retrieved from http://wpacouncil.org/files/framework-for-success-postsecondary-writing.pdf
Critical Art Ensemble. (1998). Utopian plagiarism, hypertextuality, and electronic cultural production. In Victor J. Vitanza (Ed.), CyberReader, 2nd edition (pp. 339–350). Boston: Pearson.
Cubbison, Laurie. (1999). Configuring Listserv, configuring discourse. Computers and Composition, 16, 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(99)00017-1
Cummings, Robert E. (2006). Coding with power: Toward a rhetoric of computer coding and composition. Computers and Composition, 23, 430–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2006.08.002
dallasnews administrator. (2012, February 19). Running for president? You cannot be Siri-ous. The Dallas Morning News. Retrieved from https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2012/02/19/running-for-president-you-cannot-be-siri-ous/
Davis, Rebecca Frost, Gold, Matthew K., Harris, Katherine D., & Sayers, Jentery. (Eds.) (2015). Digital pedagogy in the humanities: Concepts, models, and experiments. Retrieved from https://digitalpedagogy.mla.hcommons.org/
DeLuca, Katherine. (2015). “Can we block these political thingys? I just want to get f*cking recipes”: Women, rhetoric, and politics on Pinterest. Kairos, 19(3). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/19.3/topoi/deluca/index.html
DePew, Kevin Eric. (2005). Second language writers in digital contexts. Special issue of Computers and Composition, 22, 255–410.
Detail for CIP code 23. (n.d.). IES National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved October 7, 2019, from https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/cipcode/cipdetail.aspx?y=56&cipid=90654
Detail for CIP code 23.1303. (n.d.). IES National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved October 7, 2019, from https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/cipcode/cipdetail.aspx?y=56&cipid=90660
Detail for CIP code 23.1399. (n.d.). IES National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved October 7, 2019, from https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/cipcode/cipdetail.aspx?y=56&cipid=91427
deWinter, Jennifer, & Stephanie Vie. (2008). Press enter to “say”: Using Second Life to teach critical media literacy. Computers and Composition, 25, 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2008.04.003
DeWitt, Scott Lloyd. (2002). Writing inventions: Identities, technologies, pedagogies. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Dryer, Dylan B. (2019). Divided by primes: Competing meanings among writing studies’ keywords. College English, 81(3), 214–255.
Dyehouse, Jeremiah, Pennell, Michael, & Shamoon, Linda K. (2009). “Writing in electronic environments”: A concept and a course for the writing and rhetoric major. College Composition, and Communication, 61(2), W330–W350.
Ede, Lisa, & Lunsford, Andrea. (1984). Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy. College Composition and Communication, 35, 155–171.
Ellertson. Anthony. (2003). Some notes on simulacra machines: Flash in first-year composition, and tactics in spaces of interruption. Kairos, 8(2). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/8.2/binder.html?features/ellertson/home.html
English, Joel A. (1998). MOO-based metacognition: Introduction. Kairos, 3(1), Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/3.1/features/english/intro.html
Enoch, Jessica, & Bessette, Jean. (2013). Meaningful engagements: Feminist historiography and the digital humanities. College Composition and Communication, 64(4), 634–660.
Espinosa, Lorelle L., Turk, Jonathan M., Taylor, Morgan, & Chessman, Hollie M. (2019). Race and ethnicity in higher education: A status report. Washington, DC: American Council on Education. Retrieved from https://1xfsu31b52d33idlp13twtos-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Race-and-Ethnicity-in-Higher-Education.pdf
Estrem, Heidi, Adler-Kassner, Linda, Allen, Nancy, Arrington, Phillip K., Benninghoff, Steve, & Krause, Steven D. (Eds.). (2007). The writing major. Special issue of Composition Studies, 35(1), 1–158.
Eyman, Douglas. (2015). Digital rhetoric: Theory, method, practice. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Retrieved from https://www.press.umich.edu/4536325/digital_rhetoric
———. (1996). Hypertext in the computer-facilitated writing class. Kairos, 1(2). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/1.2/binder.html?features/eyman/index.html
Eyman, Douglas, & Ball, Cheryl E. (2015). Digital humanities scholarship and electronic publication. In Jim Ridolfo & William Hart-Davidson (Eds.), Rhetoric and the digital humanities (pp. 65–79). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Faigley, Lester. (2003). The challenge of the multimedia essay. In Lynn Z. Bloom, Donald A. Daiker, & Edward M. White (Eds.), Composition studies in the new millennium: Rereading the past, rewriting the future (pp. 174–187). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
———. (1992). Fragments of rationality: Postmodernity and the subject of composition. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Flaherty, Collen, (2019, September 26). ‘Difficult conversations.’ Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/09/26/national-communication-association-suspends-discussion-listserv
———. (2019, March 28). More than hateful words. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/03/28/racist-writing-instructors-listserv-post-prompts-debate-about-future-field-and-how
Fleckenstein, Kristie S., Calendrillo, Linda T., & Worley, Demetrice A. (Eds.). (2002). Language and image in the reading-writing classroom: Teaching vision. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fortune, Ronald. (2002). Image, word, and future text: Visual and verbal thinking in writing instruction. In Nancy Allen (Ed)., Working with words and images: New steps in an old dance (pp. 97–116). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Fortune, Ron, & Kalmbach, Jim. (Eds.) (1999). From codex to code: Programming and the composition classroom. Special issue of Computers and Composition, 16, 319–436.
Fulwiler, Megan, & Marlow, Jennifer. (2014). Con job: Stories of adjunct and contingent labor. Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press. Retrieved from https://ccdigitalpress.org/conjob
Gail E. Hawisher & Cynthia L. Selfe Caring for the Future Scholarship: Recipients past & present. (2018, November 5). Retrieved from http://hawisherselfe.org/recipients.html
Garrison, Anthony, Remley, Dirk, Thomas, Patrick, & Wierszewski, Emily. (2011). Conventional faces: Emoticons in instant messaging discourse. Computers and Composition, 28, 112–125, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2011.04.001
George, Diana. (2002). From analysis to design: Visual communication in the teaching of writing. College Composition and Communication, 54(1), 11–39.
Gerrard, Lisa. (1995). The evolution of the Computers and Writing Conference. Computers and Composition, 12, 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(05)80066-0
Giberson, Greg A., & Moriarty, Thomas A. (Eds.). (2010). What we are becoming: Developments in undergraduate writing majors. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1026&context=usupress_pubs
Giberson, Greg A., Nugent, Jim, & Ostergaard, Lori A. (Eds.). (2015). Writing majors: Eighteen program profiles. Logan: Utah State University Press.
Glaser, Jennifer, & Micciche, Laura R. (2015). Digitizing English. In Jim Ridolfo & William Hart-Davidson (Eds.), Rhetoric and the digital humanities (pp. 199–209). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gold, Matthew K. (Ed.) (2012). Debates in the digital humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Retrieved from http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/
Gold, Matthew K. & Klein, Lauren F. (Eds.) (2016). Debates in the digital humanities. 2nd ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Retrieved from http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/
Grabill, Jeffrey T. (2003). On divides and interfaces: Access, class, and computers. Computers and Composition, 20, 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2003.08.017
Grabill, Jeff, Pigg, Stacey, Hart-Davidson, William, Curran, Paul, McLeod, Mike, Moore, Jessie, Rosinki, Paul, Peeples, Tim, Runsey, Suzanne, Rife, Martine Courant, Tasaka, Robyn, Lackey, Dundee, & Brunk-Chavez, Beth. (2010). Revisualizing composition: Mapping the writing lives of first-year college students. East Lansing, MI: The Writing in Digital Environments (WIDE) Research Center. Retrieved from http://compositionawebb.pbworks.com/f/whitepaper.pdf
Gresham, Morgan. (1999). The new frontier: Conquering the World Wide Web by mule. Computers and Composition, 16, 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(99)00018-3
Grigar, Dene. (2004a). Breath by breath: An interview with Kate Pullinger about “The Breathing Wall.” Computers and Composition, 21, 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.08.007
———. (2004b). International section of Computers and Composition. Computers and Composition, 21, 471–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.08.006
———. (2004c). Ted Nelson: Keynote speaker at Incubation 2004. Computers and Composition, 21, 485–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.08.008
———. (2005a). Kineticism, rhetoric, and new media artists. Computers and Composition, 22, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.12.005
———. (2005b). Report on the 6th International Research Conference: Consciousness reframed: Qi and complexity. Computers and Composition, 22, 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2005.02.001
———. (2007). What new media offers. Computers and Composition, 24, 214–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2007.02.003
Gruber, Sibylle. (1995). Re: Ways we contribute: Students, instructors, and pedagogies in the computer-mediated writing classroom. Computers and Composition, 12, 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/8755-4615(95)90023-3
Grusin, Richard. (2013). The dark side of digital humanities—Part 2. Center for 21st Century Studies, 9. Retrieved from https://www.c21uwm.com/2013/01/09/dark-side-of-the-digital-humanities-part-2/
———. (2014). The dark side of digital humanities: Dispatches from two recent MLA conventions. Differences, 25(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2420009
Gruwell, Leigh. (2015). Wikipedia’s politics of exclusion: Gender, epistemology, and feminist rhetorical (in)action. Computers and Composition, 37, 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.06.009
Gurak, Laura J., & Johnson-Eilola, Johndan. (Eds.). (1998). Intellectual property. Special issue of Computers and Composition, 15, 121–274.
Haas, Angela. 2008. Wampum as hypertext: An American Indian intellectual tradition of multimedia theory and practice. Studies in American Indian Literatures, 19(4), 77–100.
Haas, Christina. (1996). Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. New York: Routledge.
———. (1999). On the relationship between old and new technologies. Computers and Composition, 16, 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(99)00003-1
Haas, Mark, & Gardner, Clinton. (1999). MOO in your face: Researching, designing, and programming a user-friendly interface. Computers and Composition, 16, 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(99)00015-8
Haefner, Joel. (1999). The politics of code. Computers and Composition, 16, 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(99)00014-6
Halter, Susan (1997). Papertext as hypertext in Computers and the teaching of writing in American higher education, 1979–1994: A history. Kairos, 2(1). Retrieved from http://technorhetoric.net/2.1/binder.html?reviews/history/historsh.html
Harris, Joseph. (2012). A teaching subject: Composition since 1966. 2nd ed. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
Harris, Leslie D. (1996). Using MOOs to teach composition and literature. Kairos, 1(2). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/1.2/binder2.html?coverweb/Harris/contents.htm
Harris, Leslie D., & Wambeam, Cynthia A. (1996). The internet-based composition classroom: A study in pedagogy. Computers and Composition, 13, 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(96)90024-9
Harris, Muriel, & Pemberton, Michael. (1995). Online writing labs (OWLs): A taxonomy of options and issues. Computers and Composition, 12, 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/8755-4615(95)90003-9
Hart-Davidson, Bill, Cushman, Ellen, Grabill, Jeff, DeVoss, Dànielle Nicole, & Porter, Jim, Writing in Digital Environments (WIDE) Research Center Collective. (2005). Why teach digital writing? Kairos, 10(1). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/10.1/binder2.html?coverweb/wide/index.html
Hart-Davidson, Bill, & Krause, Steven D. with Carbone, Nick, Day, Michael, English, Joel, Harris, Trish, Johnson-Eilola, Johndan, Nellen, Ted, Palmquist, Mike, Rice, Rich, & Rickly, Rebecca. (2004). Re: The future of computers and writing: A multivocal textumentary. Computers and Composition, 21, 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2003.08.008
Hartley, Cecelia, Schendel, Ellen, & Neal, Michael R. (1999). Writing (online) spaces: Composing Webware in Perl. Computers and Composition, 16, 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(99)00016-X
Haswell, Richard H. (2005). NCTE/CCCC recent war on scholarship. Written Communication, 22(2), 198–223.
Havelock, Eric. (1982). The literate revolution in Greece and its cultural consequences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
———. (1988). The muse learns to write. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
———. (1977). The preliteracy of the Greeks. New Literary History, 8, 369–391.
Hawisher, Gail E. (1998). Computers & Writing 1998 community meetings. Kairos, 3(2). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/3.2/coverweb/statements/hawisher.html
Hawisher, Gail E., LeBlanc, Paul, Moran, Charles, & Selfe, Cynthia L. (1996). Computers and the teaching of writing in American higher education, 1979–1994: A history. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Hawisher, Gail E., & Selfe, Cynthia L. (Eds.) (2005). The influence of Gunther Kress’s work. Special issue of Computers and Composition, 22, 1–128.
———. (Eds.) (1999). Passions, pedagogies, and 21st-century technologies. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs/119
———. (1991). The rhetoric of technology and the electronic writing class. College Composition and Communication, 42(1), 55–65.
Heba, Gary. (1997). HyperRhetoric: Multimedia, literacy, and the future of composition. Computers and Composition, 14, 19–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(97)90036-0
Heilker, Paul, & Vandenberg, Peter. (Eds.) (2015). Keywords in writing studies. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
Hewett, Beth L. (2001). Generating new theory for online writing instruction. Kairos, 6(2). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/6.2/binder.html?features/hewett/index.html
Hewett, Beth, & Ehmann, Christa. (2004). Preparing educators for online writing instruction: Principles and processes. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Hirsch, Brett D. (Ed.) (2012). Digital humanities pedagogy: Practices, principles and politics. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.
Hirvela, Alan. (2005). Computer-based reading and writing across the curriculum: Two case studies of L2 writers. Computers and Composition, 22, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2005.05.005
Hobson, Eric. (Ed.). (1998). Wiring the writing center. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
Hockey, Susan. (2004). The history of humanities computing. In Susan Schreibman, Ray Siemens, & John Unsworth (Eds.), A companion to digital humanities. Oxford: Blackwell. Retrieved from http://www.digitalhumanities.org/companion/
Howard, Rebecca Moore. (2000). Sexuality, textuality: The cultural work of plagiarism. College English, 62, 37–55.
———. (1999). Standing in the shadow of giants: Plagiarists, authors, collaborators. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
Hunter, Rik. (2011). Erasing “property lines”: A collaborative notion of authorship and textual ownership on a fan wiki. Computers and Composition, 28, 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2010.12.004
Hussar, William J., & Bailey, Tabitha M. (2018). Projections of education statistics to 2026. NCES 2018–2019. National Center for Education Statistics.
Inman, James A. (2004). Computers and writing: The cyborg era. New York: Routledge
Inman, James A., & Sewell, Donna N. (Eds). (2000). Taking flight with OWLs: Examining electronic writing center work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
IPEDS. (n.d.). IES National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data/survey-components/7/completions
Jackson, Gerald. (2016). Book review: Ethical programs: Hospitality and the rhetoric of software. Computers and Composition, 42, 110–113.
Jackson, Peggy. (n.d.). WANDAH: Implications for writing evaluation and assessment. Retrieved from http://comppile.org/archives/NTW/Nov%2086%20PDF%20Files/Gerrard%20and%20Cohen.pdf
Jagoda, Patrick (2013). The dark side of digital humanities—Part 3. Center for 21st Century Studies, 9. Retrieved from https://www.c21uwm.com/2013/01/09/the-dark-side-of-the-digital-humanities-part-3/
Johnson, J. Paul. (1996). Writing spaces: Technoprovocateurs and OWLs in the late age of print. Kairos, 1(1). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/1.1/binder2.html?owls/johnson.html
Johnson, Robert R. (1997). Audience involved: Toward a participatory model of writing. Computers and Composition, 14, 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(97)90006-2
Johnson-Eilola, Johndan. (2005). Datacloud: Toward a new theory of online work. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
———. (1997). Nostalgic angels: Rearticulating hypertext writing. New Jersey: Ablex.
Johnson-Eilola, Johndan, & Kimme-Hea, Amy C. (2003). After hypertext: Other ideas. Computers and Composition, 20, 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2003.08.014
Johnson-Eilola, Johndan, & Selber, Stuart. (2007). Plagiarism, originality, assemblage. Computers and Composition, 24, 375–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2007.08.003
Joyce, Michael. (1995). Of two minds: Hypertext pedagogy, and poetics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kalmbach, James. (2002). The ransom note fallacy and the acquisition of typographic emphasis. In Nancy Allen (Ed.), Working with words and images: New steps in an old dance (pp. 43–56). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Kirschenbaum, Matthew. (2012). Digital humanities as/is a tactical turn. In Matthew K. Gold (Ed.), Debates in the digital humanities (pp. 415–428). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
———. (2010). What is digital humanities and what’s it doing in English departments? ADE Bulletin, 150, 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1632/ade.150.55
Kirtley, Susan. (2005). Students’ views on technology and writing: The power of personal history. Computers and Composition, 22, 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2005.02.006
Knievel, Michael. (2009). What is humanistic about computers and writing? Historical patterns and contemporary possibilities for the field. Computers and Composition, 26, 92–106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2009.02.002
Knievel, Michael, & Sheridan-Rabideau, Mary P. (2009). Articulating “responsivity” in context: Re-making the M.A. in composition and rhetoric for the electronic age. Computers and Composition, 26, 24–37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2008.11.003
Kostelnick, Charles. (1989). Process paradigms in design and composition: Affinities and directions. College Composition and Communication, 40(3), 267–281.
Krause, Steven D. (2014). After the invasion: What’s next for MOOCs? In Steven D. Krause & Charles Lowe (Eds.), Invasion of the MOOCs: The promises and perils of massive open online courses. (pp. 223–228). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
Krause, Steven D., & Lowe, Charles. (Eds.) (2014). Invasion of the MOOCs: The promises and perils of massive open online courses. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
Kress, Gunther. (2005). Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning. Computers and Composition, 22, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.12.004
———. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York: Routledge.
Kress, Gunther, & van Leeuwen, Theo. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. New York: Oxford University Press.
———. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. New York: Routledge.
Landow, George P. (1997). Hypertext 2.0: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lang, Susan, Walker, Janice R., & Dorwick, Keith. (Eds.). (2000). Tenure 2000. Special issue of Computers and Composition, 17, 1–115.
Lauer, Claire. (2009). Contending with terms: “Multimodal” and “multimedia” in the academic and public sphere. Computers and Composition, 26, 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2009.09.001
———. (2014). Expertise with new/multi/modal/visual/digital/media technologies desired: Tracing composition’s evolving relationship with technology through the MLA JIL. Computers and Composition, 34, 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2014.09.006
Lauer, Janice M. (1984). Composition studies: Dappled discipline. Rhetoric Review, 3(1), 20–29.
Leverenz, Carrie S. (2014). Design thinking and the wicked problem of teaching writing. Computers and Composition, 33, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2014.07.001
Lewis, Lynn C. (2009). Review of “Publics, intellectuals, and the digital humanities.” Kairos, 14(2). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/praxis/tiki-index.php?page=CW_2009
Liu, Alan. (2009). Digital humanities and academic change. English Language Notes, 47(1), 17–35.
Lockridge, Timothy, Paz, Enrique, & Johnson, Cynthia. (2017). The Kairos preservation project. Computers and Composition, 46, 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2017.09.002
Logie, John. (1998). Champing at the bits: Computers, copyright, and the composition classroom. Computers and Composition, 15, 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(98)90054-8
Losh, Elizabeth. (2015). Nowcasting/futurecasting: Big data, prognostication, and the rhetorics of scale. In Jim Ridolfo & William Hart-Davidson (Eds.), Rhetoric and the digital humanities (pp. 286–295). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lundin, Rebecca Wilson. (2008). Teaching with wikis: Toward a networked pedagogy. Computers and Composition, 25, 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2008.06.001
Lunsford, Andrea, & West, Susan. (1996). Intellectual property and composition studies. College Composition and Communication, 47(3), 383–411.
Lunsford, Andrea, Rickly, Rebecca, Salvo, Michael, & West, Susan. (1996). What matters who writes? What matters who responds? Issues of ownership in the writing classroom. Kairos, 1(1). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/1.1/binder.html?features/lunsford/title.html
Maid, Barry. (2000). Yes, a technorhetorician can get tenure. Computers and Composition, 17, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(99)00026-2
Magda, Andrew J., Poulin, Russell, & Clinefelter, David L. (2015). Recruiting, orienting, & supporting online adjunct faculty: A survey of practices. Louisville, KY: The Learning House, Inc. Retrieved from https://wcet.wiche.edu/initiatives/research/Online-Adjunct-Faculty-2015
Marback, Richard. (2009). Embracing wicked problems: The turn to design in composition studies. College Composition and Communication, 61(2), W397–W419.
Martin, Katherine Connor. (2016, April 16). Should you capitalize the word internet? Oxford Dictionaries. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2016/04/should-you-capitalize-internet/
Mauriello, Nicholas, Pagnucci, Gian S., & Winner, Tammy. (1999). Reading between the code: The teaching of HTML and the displacement of writing instruction. Computers and Composition,16, 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(99)00020-1
McKee, Heidi A., & DeVoss, Dànielle Nicole. (Eds.) (2013). Digital writing assessment & evaluation. Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press. Retrieved from http://ccdigitalpress.org/dwae
———. (Eds.) (2007). Digital writing research: Technologies, methodologies, and ethical issues. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
McClure, Randall. (2011). WritingResearchWriting: The semantic web and the future of the research project. Computers and Composition, 28, 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2011.09.003
Meeks. Melissa Graham (2004). Wireless laptop classrooms: Sketching social and material spaces. Kairos, 9(1). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/9.1/binder2.html?coverweb/meeks/index.html
Miller, Susan. (2002). Writing studies as a mode of inquiry. In Gary A. Olson (Ed.), Rhetoric and composition as intellectual work (pp. 41–54). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
MLA Office of Research. (2015). Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2014–15. Retrieved from https://www.mla.org/content/download/40038/1744556/Rpt_JIL_14-15.pdf
———. (2017). Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2016–17. Retrieved from https://www.mla.org/content/download/78816/2172744/Report-MLA-JIL-2016-17.pdf
MLA recommendation on minimum per-course compensation for part-time faculty members. (2019, May). Modern Language Association. Retrieved from https://www.mla.org/Resources/Research/Surveys-Reports-and-Other-Documents/Staffing-Salaries-and-Other-Professional-Issues/MLA-Recommendation-on-Minimum-Per-Course-Compensation-for-Part-Time-Faculty-Members
Monty, Randall W. (2015). Everyday borders of transnational students: Composing place and space with mobile technology, social media, and multimodality. Computers and Composition, 38, 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.013
Moore, Jesse L., Rosinski, Paula, Peeples, Tim, Pigg, Stacey, Rife, Martine Courant, Brunk-Chavez, Beth, Lackey, Dundee, Rumsey, Suzanne Kesler, Tasaka, Robyn, Curran, Paul, Grabill, Jeffrey T. (2016). Revisualizing composition: How first-year writers use composing Technologies. Computers and Composition, 39, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.11.001
Moore, Margaret A. (2017). The terrain less traveled. Kairos, 22(1). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/22.1/disputatio/moore/index.html
Moran, Charles. (2003). Computers and Composition 1983–2002: What we have hoped for. Computers and Composition, 20, 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2003.08.011
———. (1992). Computers and the writing classroom: A look to the future. In Gail E. Hawisher and Paul LeBlanc (Eds.), Re-imagining computers and composition: Teaching and research in the virtual age (pp. 7–23). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
Moretti, Franco. (2013). Distant reading. New York: Verso.
———. (2007). Graphs, maps, trees. New York: Verso.
Mueller, Derek N. (2009). Digital underlife in the networked writing classroom. Computers and Composition, 26, 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2009.08.001
———. (2012). Views from a distance: A nephological model of the CCCC chairs’ addresses, 1977–2011. Kairos, 16(2). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/16.2/topoi/mueller/index.html
Mullen, Laurie, Bauer, William I., & Newbold, W. Webster. (2001). Developing a university-wide electronic portfolio system for teacher education. Kairos, 6(2). Retrieved from http://technorhetoric.net/6.2/binder2.html?coverweb/assessment/mullenbauernewbold/main.htm
National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE). (2013). Definition of 21st century literacies. Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/21stcentdefinition
———. (2019). Definition of literacy in a digital age. Retrieved from https://ncte.org/statement/nctes-definition-literacy-digital-age/
Nellen, Ted (1997). A reading of Hawisher, LeBlanc, Moran, and Selfe’s Computers and the teaching of writing in American higher education, 1979–1994: A history. Kairos, 2(1). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/2.1/binder.html?reviews/history/hawisher.html
Nesi, Hilary, Sharpling, Gerard, & Ganobcsik-Williams. Lisa. (2004). Student papers across the curriculum: Designing and developing a corpus of British student writing. Computers and Composition, 21, 439–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.08.003
Nobles, Susanne, & Paganucci, Laura. (2015). Do digital writing tools deliver? Student perceptions of writing quality using digital tools and online writing environments.” Computers and Composition, 38, 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.001
Nowviskie, Bethany. (2016). On the origin of ‘hack’ and ‘yack.’ In Matthew K. Gold & Lauren F. Klein (Eds.), Debates in the digital humanities. 2nd ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Retrieved from http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/
O’Neill, Peggy, Crow, Angela, & Burton, Larry W. (Eds.). (2002). Field of dreams: Independent writing programs and the future of composition studies. Logan: Utah State University Press.
Online adjunct faculty – English composition. (2019). Southern New Hampshire University. Retrieved from https://snhu.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/Online_Adjunct_Faculty/job/Remote/XMLNAME--Online-Adjunct-Faculty---English-Composition_R0004587
Oren, Avigail. (1996). MOOing is more than writing. Kairos, 1(2). Retrieved from http://technorhetoric.net/1.2/binder2.html?coverweb/avigail.html
Palmeri, Jason. (2012). Remixing composition: A history of multimodal writing pedagogy. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Palmeri, Jason, & McCorkle, Ben. (2018). A distant view of English Journal, 1912–2012. Kairos, 22(2). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/22.2/topoi/palmeri-mccorkle/index.html
Palmquist, Mike. (2003). A brief history of computer support for writing centers and writing-across-the-curriculum programs. Computers and Composition, 20, 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2003.08.013
Parry, Dave. (2012). The digital humanities or a digital humanism. In Matthew K. Gold (Ed.), Debates in the digital humanities, (pp. 429–37), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttv8hq
Parry, David. (2011, April 7). Mobile perspectives: On teaching mobile literacy. Educause Review. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2011/4/mobile-perspectives-on-teaching-mobile-literacy
Peterson, Patricia Webb. (2001). The debate about online learning: Key issues for writing teachers. Computers and Composition, 18, 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(01)00068-8
Peterson, Patricia Webb, & Savenye, Wilhelmina. (Eds.). (2001). Distance education: Promises and perils of teaching and learning online. Special issue of Computers and Composition, 18, 319–440.
Pflugfelder, Ehren Helmut. (2015). Cell phones, networks & power: Documenting cell phone literacies. Kairos, 19(2). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/19.2/topoi/pflugfelder/index.html.
Phelps, Louise Wetherbee. (1986). The domain of composition. Rhetoric Review, 4(2), 182–194.
Pigg, Stacey. (2014). Emplacing mobile composing habits: A study of academic writing in networked social spaces. College Composition and Communication, 66(2), 250–275.
Porter, James E. (1998). Rhetorical ethics and internetworked writing. Greenwich, CN: Praeger.
Porter, Jim. (2003). Why technology matters to writing: A cyberwriter’s tale. Computers and Composition, 20, 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2003.08.020
Powell, Malea. (2004). Down by the river; Or, how Susan La Flasche Picotte can teach us about alliance as a practice of survivance. College English, 67(1), 38–60.
Purdue OWL Fact Sheet. (n.d.). Purdue Online Writing Lab. Retrieved from https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/about_the_owl/owl_information/purdue_owl_fact_sheet.html
Purdy, James P. (2017). Going digital: Ideas for updating CCCC’s Statement for a digital world. In Randall McClure, Dayna Goldstein, & Michael Pemberton (Eds.), Labored: The state(ment) and future of work in composition (pp. 225–243). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
———. (2014). What can design thinking offer writing studies? College Composition and Communication, 65(4), 612–641.
Purdy, James P., & Walker, Joyce R. (2012). Scholarship on the move: A rhetorical analysis of scholarly activity in digital spaces. In Debra Journet, Cheryl E. Ball, & Ryan Trauman (Eds.), The new work of composing. Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press. Retrieved from https://ccdigitalpress.org/nwc/chapters/purdy-walker/
———. (2010). Valuing digital scholarship: Exploring the changing realities of intellectual work. Profession, pp. 177–195.
Raley, Rita. (2013). The dark side of digital humanities—Part 4. Center for 21st Century Studies, 9. Retrieved from https://www.c21uwm.com/2013/01/09/the-dark-side-of-the-digital-humanities-part-4/
Ramsay, Stephen. (2013a). On building. In Melissa Terras, Julianne Nyhan, & Edward Vanhoutte (Eds). Defining digital humanities: A reader (pp. 243-245). New York: Routledge.
———. (2013b). Who’s in and who’s out. In Melissa Terras, Julianne Nyhan, & Edward Vanhoutte (Eds). Defining digital humanities: A reader.(pp. 239-242). New York: Routledge.
Ratcliffe, Jim. (2009). Steps in a design thinking process. K12 lab wiki. Stanford University Design School. Retrieved April 16, 2013, from https://dschool-old.stanford.edu/groups/k12/wiki/781c0/Design_Thinking_Processes.html.
Rea, Alan, & White, Doug. (1999). The changing nature of writing: Prose or code in the classroom. Computers and Composition, 16, 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(99)00021-3
Reid, Alex. (2008, March 19). Changing economics of classroom management. Digital digs. Retrieved from https://profalexreid.com/2008/03/19/changing-econom/
———. (2014). Writing and learning with feedback machines. In Steven D. Krause & Charles Lowe (Eds.), Invasion of the MOOCs: The promises and perils of massive open online courses. (pp. 204–211). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
Reilly, Colleen A., & Eyman, Douglas (2007). Multifaceted methods for multimodal texts: Alternate approaches to citation analysis for electronic sources. In Dànielle Nicole DeVoss & Heidi A. McKee (Eds.), Digital writing research: Technologies, methodologies, and ethical issues (pp. 353–375). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Reinheimer, David A. (2005). Teaching composition online: Whose side is time on? Computers and Composition, 22, 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2005.08.004
Rendahl, Merry, & Breuch, Lee Ann Kastman. (2013). Toward a complexity of online learning: Learners in online first-year writing. Computers and Composition, 30, 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2013.10.002
Reyman, Jessica. (2013). User data on the social web: Authorship, agency, and appropriation. College English, 75(5), 513–533.
Ridolfo, Jim, & Hart-Davidson, William. (Eds.). (2015). Rhetoric and the digital humanities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Romano, Susan. (1993). The egalitarianism narrative: Whose story? Which yardstick? Computers and Composition, 10, 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(17)30135-4
———. (1999). On becoming a woman: Pedagogies of the self. In Gail E. Hawisher & Cynthia L. Selfe (Eds.), Passions, pedagogies, and 21st-century technologies (pp. 249–267). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs/119
Ruszkiewicz, John. (1988). Word and image: The next revolution. Computers and Composition, 5, 9–16.
Sapp, David Alan, & Simon, James. (2005). Comparing grades in online and face-to-face writing courses: Interpersonal accountability and institutional commitment. Computers and Composition, 22, 471–489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2005.08.005
Savenye, Wilhelmina C., Olina, Zane, & Miemczyk, Mary (2001). So you are going to be an online writing instructor: Issues in designing, developing, and delivering an online course. Computers and Composition, 18, 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(01)00069-X
Sayers, Jentery. (Ed.). (2017). Making things and drawing boundaries: Experiments in the digital humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Schnapp, Jeffrey, Lunenfeld, Peter, & Presner, Todd. (2009). Digital humanities manifesto 2.0. Humanities blast. Retrieved from http://www.humanitiesblast.com/manifesto/Manifesto_V2.pdf
Schreibman, Susan, Siemens, Ray, & Unsworth, John. (Eds.). (2004). A companion to digital humanities. Oxford: Blackwell. Retrieved from http://www.digitalhumanities.org/companion/
Selfe, Cynthia L. (1998). Computers & Writing 1998 community meetings. Kairos, 3(2). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/3.2/coverweb/statements/cselfe.html
———. (1988). Computers in English departments: The rhetoric of technopower. ADE Bulletin, 90, 63–67.
———. (1999). Technology and literacy in the 21st century: The importance of paying attention. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Selfe, Cynthia L., & Hawisher, Gail E. (2004). Literate lives in the information age: Narratives of literacy from the United States. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Selfe, Cynthia L., Hawisher, Gail E. & Berry, Patrick. (2009). Sustaining scholarly efforts: The challenge of digital media. In Dànielle N. DeVoss, Heidi A. McKee, & Richard (Dickie) Selfe (Eds.), Technological ecologies and sustainability. Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press. Retrieved from https://ccdigitalpress.org/book/tes/17_selfe_hawisher_berry.pdf
Selfe, Cynthia L., & Meyer, Paul. (1991). Testing claims for on-line conferences. Written Communication, 8(2), 163–192.
Selfe, Cynthia L., & Selfe, Jr., Richard J. (1994). Politics of the interface. College Composition and Communication, 45(4), 480–504.
Shamoon, Linda, Howard, Rebecca Moore, Jamieson, Sandra, & Schwegler, Robert A. (2000). Coming of age: The advanced writing curriculum. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
Shepherd, Ryan P. (2015). FB in FYC: Facebook use among first-year composition students.” Computers and Composition, 38, 86–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2014.12.001
Silva, Mary Lourdes. (2012). Camtasia in the classroom: Student attitudes and preferences for video commentary or Microsoft Word comments during the revision process. Computers and Composition, 29, 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2011.12.001
Snyder, Ilana. (Ed.) (2002). Silicon literacies: Communication, innovation and education in the electronic age. New York: Routledge.
———. (2002). Silicon literacies. In Ilana Snyder (Ed.), Silicon literacies: Communication, innovation and education in the electronic age (pp. 3–12). New York: Routledge.
Sorapure, Madeleine. (2005). Between modes: Assessing student new media compositions. Kairos, 10(2), <http:/kairos.technorhetoric.net/10.2/binder2.html?coverweb/sorapure/index.html>
Sorapure, Madeleine, Inglesby, Pamela, & Yatchisin, George. (1998). Web literacy: Challenges and opportunities for research in a new medium. Computers and Composition, 15, 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(98)90009-3
St. Amant, Kirk, & Rice, Rich. (2015). Online writing in global contexts: Rethinking the nature of connections and communication in the age of international online media. Special issue of Computers and Composition, 38, 113–176.
Stolley, Karl. (2008). The lo-fi manifesto. Kairos, 12(3). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/12.3/topoi/stolley/
———. (2012, January 15). Why don’t writers gravitate toward code? Nineteen keystrokes. Retrieved January 6, 2015, from http://blog.karlstolley.com/post/15899219740/why-dont-writers-gravitate-toward-code
Sugimoto, Taku. (2007). Global issues: International perspectives on computers and writing. Special issue of Computers and Composition, 24, 227–372.
Sullivan, Patricia A. (1991). Taking control of the page: Electronic writing and word publishing. In Gail E. Hawisher & Cynthia L. Selfe (Eds.), Evolving perspectives on computers and composition studies: Questions for the 1990s (pp. 43–64). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Sura, Thomas. (2015). Infrastructure and wiki pedagogy: A multi-case study. Computers and Composition, 37, 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.06.002
Susser, Bernard (1993). Networks and project work: Alternative pedagogies for writing with computers. Computers and Composition, 10, 63–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(17)30138-X
Takayoshi, Pamela. (1996). The shape of electronic writing: Evaluating and assessing computer-assisted writing processes and products. Computers and Composition, 13, 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(96)90013-4
Tannacito, Terry. (2001). Teaching professional writing online with electronic peer response. Kairos, 6(1). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/6.2/binder2.html?coverweb/de/tannacito/Index.htm
Taylor, Paul. (1992). Social epistemic rhetoric and chaotic discourse. In Gail E. Hawisher and Paul Leblanc (Eds.)., Re-imagining computers and composition: Research and teaching in the virtual age (pp. 131–148). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
Taylor, Todd. (1997). The persistence of difference in networked classrooms: Non-negotiable difference and the African American student body. Computers and Composition, 14, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(97)90018-9
Terras, Melissa, Nyhan, Julianne, & Vanhoutte, Edward. (Eds.) (2013). Defining digital humanities: A reader. New York: Routledge.
Thomas, Sue. (2005). Narratives of digital life at the trAce Online Writing Centre. Computers and Composition, 22, 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2005.08.007
Tinnell, John. (2015). Grammatization: Bernard Stiegler’s theory of writing and technology. Computers and Composition, 37, 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.06.011
Tuzi, Frank. (2004). The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers and Composition, 21, 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.02.003
Twittersation. (n.d.). Urban Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=twittersation
Vee, Annette. (2017). Coding literacy: How computer programming is changing writing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vernon, Alex (2000). Computerized grammar checkers 2000: Capabilities, limitations, and pedagogical possibilities. Computers and Composition, 17, 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(00)00038-4
Vician, Chelley, & Brown, Susan A. (2000). Unraveling the message quilt: A case-study examination of student interaction in computer-based communication assignments. Computers and Composition, 17, 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(00)00030-X
Vie, Stephanie. (2008). Digital divide 2.0: “Generation M” and online social networking sites in the composition classroom. Computers and Composition, 25, 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2007.09.004
Vielstimmig, Myka. (1999). Petals on a wet, black bough: Textuality, collaboration, and the new essay. In Gail E. Hawisher & Cynthia L. Selfe (Eds.), Passions, pedagogies, and twenty-first century technologies (pp. 89–114). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs/119
Vojak, Colleen, Kline, Sonia, Cope, Bill, McCarthey, Sarah, & Kalantzis, Mary. (2011). New spaces and old places: An analysis of writing assessment software. Computers and Composition, 28, 97–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2011.04.004
Walker, Janice R. (1998). Copyrights and conversations: Intellectual property in the classroom. Computers and Composition, 15, 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(98)90057-3
———. (2001). Resisting resistance: Power and control in the technologized classroom. In Andrea Greenbaum (Ed.), Insurrection: Approaches to resistance in composition studies (pp. 119–132). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Walker, Janice R., & Taylor, Todd. (2006). The Columbia guide to online style. 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
Walker, Janice R., Blair, Kristine L., Eyman, Douglas, Hart-Davidson, Bill, McLeod, Mike, Grabill, Jeff, Purdy, James P., Sorapure, Madeleine, Tulley, Christine, & Vitanza, Victor J. (2011). Computers and composition 20/20: A conversation piece, or what some very smart people have to say about the future. Computers and Composition, 28, 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2011.09.004
Walls, Douglas. (2015). In/between programs: Forging a curriculum between rhetoric and the digital humanities. In Jim Ridolfo & William Hart-Davidson (Eds.), Rhetoric and the digital humanities (pp. 210-223). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wardrip-Fruin, Noah, & Harrigan, Pat. (Eds.). (2004). First person: New media as story, performance, and game. Des. Michael Crumpton. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ware, Paige D. (2004). Confidence and competition online: ESL student perspectives on web-based discussions in the classroom. Computers and Composition, 21, 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.08.004
Watkins, Jr., James Ray. (1999). Hypertextual border crossing: Students and teachers, texts and contexts. Computers and Composition, 16, 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(99)00019-5
Welch, Kathleen E. (1999). Electric rhetoric: Classical rhetoric, oralism, and a new literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Werner, Courtney L. (2015). Speaking of composing (frameworks): New media discussions, 2000–2010. Computers and Composition, 37, 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.06.005
What is the CIP? (n.d.). IES National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved September 23, 2019, from https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/cipcode/Default.aspx?y=56
What is Kairos? A brief history of the journal. (n.d.). Kairos. Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/about.html
Winner, Tammy, & Shields, Theodore. (2002). Breaking the island chains: A case study exploring the intricate powers of language shared on the World Wide Web. Computers and Composition, 19, 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(02)00129-9
Williams, Sean D. (2001). Part 1: Thinking out of the pro-verbal box. Computers and Composition, 18, 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(00)00045-1
Wolff, William I. (2015). “Baby, we were born to tweet”: Springsteen fans, the writing practices of in situ tweeting, and the research possibilities for Twitter. Kairos, 19(3). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/19.3/topoi/wolff/index.html
Womack, Anne-Marie, Blanchard, Annelise, Wang, Cassie, & Jessee, Mary Catherine. (2015). Accessible syllabus. Retrieved from https://www.accessiblesyllabus.com/
Wysocki, Anne Frances. (2002). A bookling monument. Kairos, 7(3). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/7.3/binder2.html?coverweb/wysocki/index.html
———. (2001). Impossibly distinct: On form/content and word/image in two pieces of computer-based interactive multimedia. Computers and Composition, 18, 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(01)00053-6
———. (1998). Monitoring order: Visual desire, the organization of web pages, and teaching the rules of design. Kairos, 3(2). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/3.2/features/wysocki/bridge.html
Wysocki, Anne Frances, & Johnson-Eilola, Johndan. (1999). In Gail E. Hawisher & Cynthia L. Selfe (Eds.), Passions, pedagogies, and 21st-century technologies (pp. 349–368). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs/119
Yancey, Kathleen Blake. (2004). Made not only in words: Composition in a new key. College Composition and Communication, 56(2), 297–328.
Youngjoo, Yi, & Hirvela, Alan. (2010). Technology and “self-sponsored” writing: A case study of a Korean-American adolescent. Computers and Composition, 27, 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2010.03.005
Zoetewey, Meredith W., & Staggers, Julie. (2003). Beyond current-traditional design: Assessing rhetoric in new media. Issues in Writing, 13, 133–157.
Page 1