sustainable learning spaces

Five Decades Later: Integrating Technology in a Large, Lecture Hall

Rebecca Gould, Kansas State University

Background
Evolution of Learning Spaces
Dilemma
Process and Timeline
Key Players and Their Roles
Challenges
Renovation
Technology
Lessons Learned
Continuous Improvement

Dilemma

The first and largest classroom on the Kansas State University campus, Umberger 105, was constructed in 1954. For almost half a century, the room was unchanged until, in 1995, it was upgraded with an 800-lumens, 80-pound Show Star projector, projector lift, a huge podium (4’x5’), VHS player, PowerMac 6100 with dual boot capabilities, a low-resolution composite video Elmo document camera, and a complete sound system with a manual audio mixer. Looming behind the faculty was a 345 square foot stage, which was too costly to remove. After a fresh coat of battleship gray paint, Umberger 105 (UM 105), with a capacity of 483 students, became a showpiece—the first centrally funded technology classroom on the campus. Disciplines, including art, business, education, geology, journalism, psychology, sociology, and statistics, clamored to schedule the room for introductory to senior level courses, with an average of 3,500 students enrolled in courses using the room each semester.

Figure 1. Overview video of Umberger 105
This video of Umberger 105 provides an overview of the room with close up pictures of the back of the room, the pencil sharpener, and the podium and its contents. This is very similar to the appearance of the room in 1995. Between May 16, 2011 through October 17, 2011, Umberger 105 was gutted and renovated. The video, pictures and timeline chronicle the renovation.

A short video of UM 105 prior to renovation is provided in Figure 1. With a distance from the faculty to the student in the last row in the last seat equal to 100 feet, limited interactivity was possible, as demonstrated in Figure 2. A panoramic view of the room is provided in Figure 3. The stage behind the podium served no purpose and was 11 ½ ' wide x 30' deep. The screen was 20' x 15'. A scissor lift provided for periodic service of the projector (Figure 4).

A large lecture hall with rows of chairs facing the front of the room. A side view of the room showing rows of chairs facing the front of the classroom. A projector mounted on the ceiling has an accordion-style mount that allows it to move up or down.
Figure 2. Umberger 105 south to north view: This view was taken from the 345 square foot stage located at the south end of the room, behind the podium. Consider the view of the faculty at the podium with the room at full capacity. Distance from the podium to the last seat, last row is 100 feet. From 1995 to May 2011, the room looked much like this, with the exception of the worn carpet.
Figure 3. Panoramic view of Umberger 105: Looking closely the viewer will note the numbers on the chairs and the yellow signage on the east wall. Also on the east wall is Tectum used for acoustical purposes.
Figure 4. Scissor lift: In 1995, the scissor lift was designed to hold an 80-pound projector and allow for servicing of equipment. By 2011, the projector weighed about 25 pounds.

There are many challenges listed above that are related specifically to this environment including the original stage, second floor balcony, and exterior stoop. Other challenges are probably found at many institutions including shortening the distance from student to faculty, improving the viewing angles, and eliminating the ability for a faculty to be lost behind the podium. Students come in all shapes and sizes and the team needed to be sensitive to that when planning for seating. Sound and acoustics, simple technologies, are often overlooked in room updates. Prior to the renovation, some faculty  would try to teach without using a microphone. This was a sure-fire way to disengage students.

Due to the changing landscape in teaching and learning, the volume of students in/out of the room, and daunting upkeep requirements, within ten years UM 105 was in desperate need of an extreme makeover. While the technology had been refreshed every three to five years, no other updates occurred. By 2007, the room was an eyesore and not conducive to current pedagogy, faculty teaching style, or learner preferences. This story is similar to that of other universities, a large eyesore of a lecture hall after five decades of minor updates no longer fit current pedagogy, faculty teaching style or learner preferences.

Next Page - References
HomeCreating | Reinventing | Sustaining