• Lunsford, Foreword
  • McKee and DeVoss, Preface
  • 1: Poe, "Making Digital Writing Assessment Fair for Diverse Writers"
  • 2: Crow, "Managing Datacloud Decisions and 'Big Data': Understanding Privacy Choices in Terms of Surveillant Assemblages"
  • 3: Moran and Herrington, "Seeking Guidance for Assessing Digital Compositions/Composing"
  • 4: Reilly and Atkins, "Rewarding Risk: Designing Aspirational Assessment Processes for Digital Writing Projects"
  • 5: Wierszewski, "'Something Old, Something New': Evaluative Criteria in Teachers' Responses to Student Multimodal Texts"
  • 6: McCorkle, Braun, and Delagrange, "Stirred, Not Shaken: An Assessment Remixology"
  • 7: The National Writing Project MAP Group, "Developing Domains for Multimodal Writing Assessment: The Language of Evaluation, the Language of Instruction"
  • 8: Yancey, McElroy, and Powers, "Composing, Networks, and Electronic Portfolios: Notes toward a Theory of Assessing ePortfolios"
  • 9: VanKooten, "Toward a Rhetorically Sensitive Assessment Model for New Media Composition"
  • 10: Zoetewey, Grabill, and Simmons, "Assessing Civic Engagement: Responding to Online Spaces for Public Deliberation"
  • 11: Brunk-Chavez and Fourzan-Rice, "The Evolution of Digital Writing Assessment in Action: Integrated Programmatic Assessment"
  • 12: Bourelle, Rankins-Robertson, Bourelle, and Roen, "Assessing Learning in Redesigned Online First-Year Composition Courses"
  • 13: Langbehn, McIntyre, and Moxley, "Re-Mediating Writing Program Assessment"
  • 14: Zanzucchi and Truong, "Thinking Like a Program: How Electronic Portfolio Assessment Shapes Faculty Development Practices"
  • White, Afterword
  • Author Biographies

ISBN: 978-0-87421-949-4

Citation Information

Requests for Permissions

Accessibility Statement

Acknowledgments

Digital Writing: Assessment and Evaluation


Chapter 6

STIRRED, NOT SHAKEN: AN ASSESSMENT REMIXOLOGY

Susan H. Delagrange, Ben McCorkle, and Catherine C. Braun

horizontal line, spacer

Introduction

Evolving Rubric

Fair Use

Remixing Learning Outcomes

Conclusion

References and Appendix


horizontal line, spacer

REFERENCES

Arts and Sciences Curriculum and Assessment Office. General education goals and expected learning outcomes. Retrieved from https://asccas.osu.edu/curriculum/ge-goals-and-learning-outcomes

Ball, Cheryl. (2006). Designerly ≠ readerly: Re-assessing multimodal and new media rubrics for use in writing studies. Convergence, 12, 393–412.

Ball, Cheryl E. (2012). Assessing scholarly multimedia: A rhetorical genre studies approach. Technical Communications Quarterly, 21, 61–77.

Barthes, Roland. (1977). The death of the author. In Image-music-text (pp. 142–148). New York: Hill & Wang.

Borton, Sonya C., & Huot, Brian. (2007). Responding and assessing. In Cynthia Selfe (Ed.), Multimodal composition: Resources for teachers (pp. 99–111). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Broad, Bob. (2003). What we really value: Beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing. Logan: Utah State University Press.

Center for Social Media. (2005). Documentary filmmakers’ statement of best practices in Fair Use. Retrieved from http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org/sites/default/files/fair_use_final.pdf

Conference on College Composition and Communication. (2004). CCCC position statement on teaching, learning, and assessing writing in digital environments. Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/digitalenvironments

Council of Writing Program Administrators. (2011). Framework for success in postsecondary writing. Retrieved from http://wpacouncil.org/files/framework-for-successpostsecondary-writing.pdf

Davidson, Cathy N. (2011). Now you see it: How the brain science of attention will transform the way we live, work, and learn. New York: Viking.

Huot, Brian. (2002). (Re)articulating writing assessment for teaching and learning. Logan: Utah State University Press.

Katz, Susan M., & Lee Odell. (2012). Making the implicit explicit in assessing multimodal composition. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21, 1–5.

Keller, Daniel. (2007). Thinking rhetorically. In Cynthia Selfe (Ed.), Multimodal composition: Resources for teachers (pp. 49–63). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Kuhn, Virginia; Johnson, DJ; & Lopez, Dave. (2012). Speaking with students: Profiles in digital pedagogy. Kairos, 14 (2). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/14.2/interviews/kuhn/index.html

Lessig, Lawrence. (2004). Remix is a cultural right, Lessig says. Virginia Law. Retrieved from http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/news/2004_fall/lessig.htm

Manion, Christopher E., & Selfe, Richard. (2012). Sharing as assessment ecology: Digital media, wikis, and the social work of knowledge. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21, 25–45.

National Council of Teachers of English. (2009). Literacy learning in the 21st century. The Council Chronicle, 18, 15–16. Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Magazine/CC0183_Brief_Literacy.pdf

Negativland. (2005). No business. [CD liner notes]. San Francisco: Seeland Records.

Packer, Randall. (2004). Introduction to multimedia history & theory. Retrieved from http://www.zakros.com/au/multi_hist_F04/mult_hist_F04.html

Penrod, Diane. (2005). Composition in convergence: The impact of new media on writing assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Shipka, Jody. (2009). Negotiating rhetorical, material, methodological, and technical difference: Evaluating multimodal designs. College Composition and Communication, 61, 343–66.

Sorapure, Madeleine. (2006). Between modes: assessing student new media compositions. Kairos, 10 (2). Retrieved from http://endora.wide.msu.edu/10.2/coverweb/sorapure/index.html

Takayoshi, Pamela. (1996). The shape of electronic writing: Evaluating and assessing computer-assisted writing processes and products. Computers and Composition, 13, 245–258.

TIME global warming cover. (April 28, 2008.) TIME Magazine, 171. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20080428,00.html

U.S. Copyright Office. (2009). Copyright: Fair use. Retrieved from http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html

Waldo, Mark L., & Espinosa-Aguilar, Amanda. (2001). Linking assignment design to paper grading in classes about diversity. In Phyllis Sherman Kahaney & Judith Liu (Eds.), Contested terrain: Diversity, writing, and knowledge (pp. 133–150). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Yancey, Kathleen Blake. (2004). Made not only in words: Composition in a new key. College Composition and Communication, 56, 297–328.

Zoetewey, Meredith W., & Staggers, Julie. (2003). Beyond “current traditional” design: Assessing rhetoric in new media. Issues in Writing, 13, 133–157.

 

Link to Appendix

Appendix

horizontal line, spacer

Return to Top

horizontal line, spacer
CCDP logo