Trajectories of Persons and Practices: Sociohistoric Perspectives of Disciplinary Development. The Case Study of Terri Ulmer



Acker, Kathy. (1978). Blood and guts in high school. New York: Grove Press.

Agha, Asif. (2005). Introduction: Semiosis across encounters. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1), 1-5.

Agha, Asif. (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Artemeva, Natasha. (2005). A time to speak, a time to act: A rhetorical genre analysis of a novice engineer’s calculated risk taking. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(4), 389-421.

Artemeva, Natasha. (2009). Stories of becoming: A study of novice engineers learning genres of their professions. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 158-178). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse/Parlor Press.

Bakhtin, Mikhal. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. (C. Emerson & Michael Holquist, Trans; M. Holquist, Ed.). Austin, TX; University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, Mikhail. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Trans. Vern W. McGee. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Barany, Michael, & MacKenzie, David. (2014). Chalk: Materials and concepts in mathematics research. In C. Coopmans, M. Lynch, J. Vertesi, & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice revisited (pp. 107-29). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bartholomae, David. (1985). Inventing the university. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can’t write: Studies in writer’s block and other composing-process problems (pp. 134-65). New York: Guilford Press.

Barton, David, & Hamilton, Mary. (1988). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. New York: Routledge.

Bazerman, Charles. (1981). What written knowledge does: Three examples of academic discourse. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2, 361-387.

Bazerman, Charles. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genres and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Bazerman, Charles. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79–101). London: Taylor & Francis.

Bazerman, Charles. (1997). The life of genre, the life in the classroom. In W. Bishop & H. Ostrom (Eds.), Genre and writing: Issues, arguments, alternatives (pp. 19–26). Portsmouth, NJ: Boynton/Cook.

Bazerman, Charles. (1999). The languages of Edison's light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Bazerman, Charles. (2004). Intertextualities: Volosinov, Bakhtin, literary theory, and literacy studies. In A. Ball & S. W. Freedman (Eds.), Bakhtinian perspectives of language, literacy, and learning (pp. 53-65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bazerman, Charles, & Prior, Paul. (Eds.). (2004). What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Beach, King. (2003). Consequential transitions: A developmental view of knowledge propagation through social organizations. In T. Tuomi-Grohn & Y. Engestrom (Eds.), Between school and work: New Perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 39-62). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

Beaufort, Anne. (1999). Writing in the real world: Making the transition from school to work. New York: Teachers College Press.

Beaufort, Anne (2004). Developmental gains of a history major: A case for building a theory of disciplinary writing expertise. Research in the Teaching of English, 39(2), 136-185.

Beaufort, Anne. (2007). College writing and beyond. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

Becker, Howard S. (2000). Cases, causes, conjunctures, stories and imagery. In R. Gomm, M. Hammersley, & P. Foster (Eds.), Case study method (pp. 223-233). London: Sage.

Bellwoar, Hannah. (2012). Everyday matters: Reception and use as productive design of health-related texts. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21(4), 325-345.

Berkenkotter, Carol, Huckin, Thomas & Ackerman, John. (1988). Conventions, conversations, and the writer: Case study of a student in a rhetoric Ph.D program. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 9-44.

Berry, Patrick W., Hawisher, Gail E., & Selfe, Cynthia L. (2012). Transnational literate lives in digital times. Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press.

Bizzell, Patricia. (1999). Hybrid academic discourses: What, why, and how. Composition Studies, 27, 7-21.

Black, Rebecca. (2008). Adolescents and online fan fiction. New York: Peter Lang.

Blakeslee, Ann. (1997). Activity, context, interaction, and authority: Learning to write scientific papers in situ. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11(2), 125–169.

Bolter, Jay D., & Grusin, Richard. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. (1990). The logic of practice (R. Nice, trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Brandt, Deborah. (2001). Literacy in American lives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brandt, Deborah. (2015). The rise of writing: Redefining mass literacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Brent, David. (2012). Crossing boundaries: Co-op students relearning to write. College Composition and Communication, 63, 558-592.

Brodkey, Linda. (1987). Academic writing as social practice. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Buck, Amber. (2012). Examining digital literacy practices on social network sites. Research in the Teaching of English, 47, 9-38.

Burke, Kenneth. (1969 [1945]). A grammar of motives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Burke, Kenneth. (1984). Permanence and change: An anatomy of purpose. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Burke, Kenneth. (2001). A grammar of motives. In P. Bizzell & B. Herzberg (Eds.), The rhetorical tradition: Readings from classical times to the present (pp. 1298–1324). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.

Carroll, Lee Ann. (2002). Rehearsing new roles: How college students develop as writers. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Casanave, Christine P. (2002). Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacy practices in higher education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cha, Tteressa Hak Kyung. (1982). Dictee. New York: Tanam Press.

Chin, Elaine. (1994). Redefining “context” in research on writing. Written Communication, 11(4), 445-482.

Chiseri-Strater, Elizabeth. (1991). Academic literacies: The public and private discourse of university students. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.

Compton-Lilly, Ccatherine. (2011). Literacy and schooling in one family across time. Research in the Teaching of English, 45, 224-51.

Cushman, Ellen. (1998). The struggle and the tools: Oral and literate strategies in an inner city community. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Dias, Patrick, Freedman, Aviva, Medway, Patrick, & Paré, Anthony. (1999). Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Dodier, Nicholas. (1998). Clinical practice and procedures in occupational medicine: A study of the framing of individuals. In M. Berg & A. Mol (Eds.), Differences in medicine: Unraveling practices, techniques, and bodies (pp. 53-85). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Dominguez Barajas, Elias. (2007). Parallels in academic and nonacademic discursive styles: An analysis of a Mexican Woman’s Narrative Performance. Written Communication, 24, 140-167.

Donahue, Christiane. (2012). Transfer, portability, generalization: (How) does composition expertise “carry”? In Kelly Ritter & Paul Matsuda (Eds.), Exploring composition studies: Sites, issues, perspectives (pp. 145-166). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

Engeström, Yrjo. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a test bench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Fahnestock, Jeanne, & Secor, Marie. (1988). The rhetoric of literary criticism. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 77-96). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Fishman, Andrea. (1990). Becoming literate: A lesson from the Amish. In A. Lunsford, H. Moglen, & J. Slevin (Eds.), The right to literacy (pp. 92-101). New York: MLA.

Flower, Linda, & Hayes, John R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.

Freedman, Aviva, & Adam, Christine. (2000). Write where you are: Learning to write in academic and workplace settings. In P. X. Dias & A. Paré (Eds.), Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings (pp. 31-60). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

Freedman, Aviva, Adam, Christine, & Smart, Grahm. (1994). Wearing suits to class: Simulating and simulations as genre. Written Communication, 11(2), 193-226.

Freedman, Sarah. (1987). Response to student writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Garvey, Ellen. G. (2013). Writing with scissors: American scrapbooks from the Civil War to the Harlem Renaissance. New York: Oxford University Press. Print

Geisler, Cheryl. (1994). Academic literacy and the nature of expertise: Reading, writing, and knowing in academic philosophy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Gere, Anne R. (1994). Kitchen tables and rented rooms: The extracurriculum of composition. College Composition and Communication, 45(1), 75-92.

Goodwin, Charles. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633.

Goodwin, Charles. (1995). Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science, 25(2), 237-274.

Goodwin, Charles. (1996). Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson ( Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 370-404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodwin, Charles, & Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1997). Contested vision: The discursive constitution of Rodney King. In B.-L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell, & B. Nordberg. (Eds.), The construction of professional discourse (pp. 292-316). London: Longman.

Grabill, Jeffrey. (2007). Writing community change: Designing technologies for citizen action. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Guerra, Juan C. (2007). Out of the valley: Transcultural repositioning as a rhetorical practice in ethnographic research and other aspects of everyday life. In C. Lewis, P. Enciso, & E. B. Moje (Eds.), Reframing sociocultural research on literacy: Identity, agency, and power (pp.137-162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Guerra, Juan C., & Farr, Marcia. (2002). Writing on the margins: The spiritual and autobiographical discourse of two Mexicanas in Chicago. In G. Hull & K. Schultz, (Eds.), School’s out: Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice (pp. 96-123). New York: Teachers College Press.

Haas, Christina. (1994). Learning to read biology: One students’ rhetorical development in college. Written Communication, 11(1), 43-84.

Heath, Shirley B. (2012). Words at work and play: Three decades in family and community life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Heath, Shirley B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Herrington, Ann. (1988). Teaching, writing and learning: A naturalistic study of writing in an undergraduate literature course. In D. Jolliffe (Ed.), Advances in writing research: Vol. 2 Writing in academic disciplines (pp. 133-166). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Herrington, Ann, & Curtis, Marcia. (2000). Persons in process: Four stories of writing and personal development in college. Urbana, IL: NCTE.

Hildebrand, Jenna M., Spafford, Marlee M., & Schryer, Catherine F. (2008). Attending to audience: Comparing optometry student talk with and about patients. Advances in Health Science Education, 14(5), 777-789.

Holland, Dorothy, Lachicotte, William, Skinner, Debra, & Cain, Carole. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Hutchins, Edwin. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Ivanič, Roz. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Jenkins, Henry. (1992). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. New York: Routledge.

Jenkins, Henry. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.

Johri, Aditya, Roth, Wolff-Michael, & Olds, Barbara. (2013). The role of representations in engineering practices: Taking a turn toward inscriptions. Journal of Engineering Education, 102, 2-19.

Jolliffe, David A., & Harl, Allison. (2008). Studying the “reading transition” from high school to college: What are our students reading and why? College English, 70,(6), 599–617.

Joly, Nathalie. (2010). Tracing cows: Practical and administrative logics in tension? In D. Barton & U. Papen (Eds.), The anthropology of writing: Understanding textually-mediated worlds (pp. 90-105). New York: Continuum.

Jones, Rodney H., & Norris, Sigrid. (2005). Introducing practice. In S. Norris & R.H. Jones (Eds.), Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis (pp. 97-99). New York: Routledge.

Kamberelis, George. (2001). Producing heteroglossic classroom (micro)cultures through hybrid discourse practice. Linguistics and Education, 12, 85-125.

Korzybski, Alfred. (1994). Science and sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. Institute of General Semantics.

Kells, Michelle H. (2007). Writing across communities: Deliberation and the discursive possibilities of WAC. Reflections, 6, 87-108.

Lam, Wan Shun Eva. (2000). Second language literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 457-483.

Lamson, Susan. (2000). TV violence: Does it cause real-life mayhem? In K. Ackley (Ed.), Perspectives on contemporary issues: Readings across the disciplines. 2nd ed. (pp. 273-76). Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers.

Lather, Patti. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge, Chapman, & Hall.

Latour, Bruno. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno. (1990). Drawing things together. In M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 19-68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Latour, Bruno. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno. (2005). Reassembling the social. New York: Oxford University Press.

Latour, Bruno, & Woolgar, Steve. (1986). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Lemke, Jay L. (1997). Cognition, context, and learning: A social semiotic perspective. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 37-56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Lemke, Jay L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin and R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science (pp. 87-113). London: Routledge.

Lemke, Jay. (2000). “Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems.” Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 273–290.

Lemke, Jay L. (2005). Place, pace, and meaning: Multimedia chronotopes. In S. Norris and R. Jones (eds), Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis (pp. 110-122). London: Routledge.

Lillis, Theresa. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation, and desire. New York: Routledge

Lillis, Theresa. (2008). Ethnography as method, methodology, and “deep-theorizing”: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication, 25(3), 353-388.

Lorimer Leonard, Rebecca. (2013). Traveling literacies: Multilingual writing on the move. Research in the Teaching of English, 48, 13-39.

Lynch, Michael. (1988). The externalized retina: Selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences. Human Studies, 11, 201-34.

Mahiri, Jabari. (1998). Shooting for excellence: African American and youth culture in new century schools. Urbana, IL: NCTE.

McCarthy, Lucille P. (1987). A stranger in strange lands: A college student writing across the curriculum. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 233-265.

McCarthy, Lucille P. (1991). A psychiatrist using DSM-III: The influence of a charter document in psychiatry. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 358-377). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

McCarthy, Lucille P., & Gerring, Joan. (1994). Revising psychiatry’s charter document: DSM-IV. Written Communication, 11(2), 147-192.

McCrary, Donald. (2005). Represent, representin’, representation: The efficacy of hybrid texts in the writing classroom. Journal of Basic Writing, 24(2), 72-91.

Medved, Michael. (2000). Hollywood poison factory. In K. Ackley (Ed.), Perspectives on contemporary issues: Readings across the disciplines. 2nd ed. (pp. 216-29). Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers.

Medway, Peter. (1996). Virtual and material buildings: Construction and constructivism in architecture and writing. Written Communication, 13(4), 473-514.

Medway, Peter. (1999). Writing and the formation of the architect. In P. Dias, A. Freedman, P. Medway, & A. Pare (Eds.), Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts (pp. 82-112). New Jersey: Erlbaum.

Medway, Peter. (2002). Fuzzy genres and community identities: The case of architecture students’ sketchbooks. In R. Coe, L. Lingard, & T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre (pp. 123–153). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Michaud, Michael J. (2013). Literacy in the lives of adult students pursuing bachelor's degrees. Open Words, 7(1), 72-95.

Miller, Peggy, Hengst, Julie, & Wang, Su-hua. (2003). Ethnographic methods: Applications from developmental cultural psychology. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 219-242). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Moss, Beverly. (2003). A community text arises : A literate text and a literacy tradition in African-American churches. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Nabakov, Vladimir. (1967). Interviews. Vladimir Nabakov: The art of fiction no. 40. (Interviewed by Herbert Gold).  The Paris Review. Available online at

Nabokov, Vladmir. (2009). The original of Laura. (Dmitri Nabokov, ed.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Nikolaidou, Zoe, & Karlsson, Anna-Malin. (2012). Constructions of caring: Identities in the new work order. In C. Bazerman, C. Dean, J. Early, K. Lunsford, S. Null, P. Rogers, & A. Stansell (Eds.), International advances in writing research: Cultures, places, measures (pp. 507-519). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse/Parlor Press.

Ostrum, Hans, Bishop, Wendy, & Haake, Katharine. (2001). Metro: Journeys in writing creatively. New York: Longman.

Perelman, Chaim, & Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Perl, Sondra. (1979). The composing process of unskilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 317-336.

Plimpton, George. (Ed.). (1976). Writers at work: The Paris review interviews, fourth series. New York: Viking Press.

Plimpton, George. (Ed.). (1998). Women writers at work. The Paris review Interviews. Ed. New York: Modern Library Press.

Pontille, David. (2010). Updating a biomedical database: Writing, reading, and invisible contribution. In D. Barton & U. Papen (Eds.), The anthropology of writing: Understanding textually-mediated worlds (pp. 47-66). London: Continuum.

Paré, Anthony. (2001). Genre and identity: Individuals, institutions, and ideology. In R. Coe, L. Lingard, & T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change (pp. 57-71). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

Poe, Mya, Lerner, Neal, & Craig, Jennifer. (2010). Learning to communicate in science and engineering: Case studies from MIT. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Prior, Paul. (1991). Contextualizing writing and response in a graduate seminar. Written Communication, 8, 267-310.

Prior, Paul. (1994). Response, revision, disciplinarity: a microhistory of a dissertation prospectus in sociology. Written Communication, 11(4), 483-533.

Prior, Paul. (1995). Tracing authoritative and internally persuasive discourses: a case study of response, revision, and disciplinary enculturation. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 288-325.

Prior, Paul. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Prior, Paul. (2004). Tracing process: How texts come into being. In C. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices. (pp. 167-200). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Prior, Paul. (2010). Remaking IO: Semiotic remediation in the design process. In P. Prior & J. Hengst (Eds.), Exploring semiotic remediation as discourse practice (pp. 206-234). London: Palgrave/Macmillan.

Prior, Paul. (2015a). Community. In Peter Vandenberg & Paul Heilker (eds.). Keywords in Writing Studies (pp. 26-31). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

Prior, Paul (2015b). Writing, literate activity, semiotic remediation: A sociocultural approach. In Georgeta Cislaru (Ed.), Writing at the crossroads: The process/product interface (pp. 183-202). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins.

Prior, Paul. (2016, February). Literate activity, dialogic semiotics, and disciplinarity: Tales of learning vs. trajectories of becoming. Plenary presented at the National Council of Teachers of English Assembly for Research (NCTEAR). Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, Michigan.

Prior, Paul, & Hengst, Julie. (2010). “Introduction: Exploring semiotic remediation.” In Paul Prior & Julie Hengst (Eds.), Exploring semiotic remediation as discourse practice (pp. 1–23). Houndsmill, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.

Prior, Paul, Hengst, Julie, Roozen, Kevin, & Shipka, Jody. (2006). “‘I’ll Be the Sun’: From Reported Speech to Semiotic Remediation Practices.” Text and Talk, 26, 733–766.

Prior, Paul, & Schaffner, Spencer. (2011). Bird identification as a family of activities: Motives, mediating artifacts, and laminated assemblages. Ethos: Journal for the Society of Psychological Anthropology, 39(1), 51-70.

Prior, Paul., & Shipka, Jody. (2003). Chronotopic lamination: Tracing the contours of literate activity. In C. Bazerman & D. R. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves, writing societies: Research from activity perspectives (pp. 180-238). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Mind, Culture, and Activity.

Purcell-Gates, Victoria. (2013). Literacy worlds of children of migrant farmworker communities participating in a migrant Head Start program. Research in the Teaching of English, 48, 68-97.

Rinehart, Richard. (1998). Players all: Performances in contemporary sport. Bloomington, IN: Indiana UP.

Rogers, Paul. (2010). The contributions of North American longitudinal studies of writing in higher education to our understanding of writing development. In C. Bazerman, R. Krut, K. Lunsford, S. McLeod, S. Null, P. Rogers, & A. Stansell (Eds.), Traditions of writing research (pp. 365-77). New York: Routledge.

Roozen, Kevin. (2010a). The “Poetry Slam,” mathemagicians, and middle school math: Tracing trajectories of actors and artifacts. In Paul Prior & Julie Hengst (Eds.), Exploring semiotic remediation as discourse practice (pp. 24-51). Houndsmill, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.

Roozen, Kevin. (2010b). Tracing trajectories of practice: Repurposing in one student's developing disciplinary writing processes. Written Communication, 27(3), 318-54.

Rose, Mike. (2005). The mind at work: Valuing the intelligence of the American worker. New York: Penguin.

Roth, Wolff-Michael. (2003). Toward an anthropology of graphing: Semiotic and activity-theoretic approaches. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

Roth, Wolff-Michael, & Bowen, G. Michael. (1999). Of cannibals, missionaries, amd converts: Graphing competencies from grade 8 to professional science inside (classrooms) and outside (field/laboratory). Science, Technology, and Human Values, 24, 179-212.

Roth, Wolff-Michael, & Hsu, Pei-Ling. (2010). Analyzing communication: Praxis of method. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Russell, David. (1995). Activity theory and its implications for writing instruction. In J. Petraglia (Ed.), Reconceiving writing, rethinking writing instruction (pp. 51-77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Russell, David. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14(4), 504-554.

Russell, David, & Yañez, Arturo. (2003). “Big picture people rarely become historians”: Genre systems and the contradictions of general education. In C. Bazerman & D. R. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves, writing societies (pp. 331–362). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Mind, Culture, and Activity.

Ryle, Gilbert. (1949). The concept of mind. New York: Barnes & Noble.

Scenters-Zapico, John. (2010). Generaciones narratives: The pursuit and practice of traditional and electronic literacies on the US-Mexico vordeliands. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

Schryer, Catherine F., Lingard, Lorelei, & Spafford, Marlee M. (2005). Techne or artful science and the genre of case presentations in healthcare settings. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 234-260.

Schryer, Catherine F., McDougall, Allan, Tait, Glendon R., & Lingard, Lorelei. (2012). Creating discursive order at the end of life: The role of genres in palliative care settings. Written Communication, 29(2), 111-141.

Scollon, Ron. (2001a). Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. London: Routledge.

Scollon, Ron. (2001b). Action and text: Towards an integrated understanding of the place of text in social (inter)action, mediated discourse analysis and the problem of social action. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 139-183). London: Sage.

Scollon, Ron. (2005). The rhythmic integration of action and discourse: Work, the body, and the earth. In S. Norris & R. H. Jones (Eds.), Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis (pp. 20–31). London: Routledge.

Scollon, R. (2008). Discourse itineraries: Nine processes of resemiotization. In V. K. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew, & R. H. Jones (Eds.), Advances in discourse studies (pp. 233-44). London: Routledge.

Scott, Charles. (1999a). Rebuild the park and the fans will come. New Expression 22 (September 1999). 11.

Scott, Charles. (1999b). The grades are in on public transportation in Chicago. New Expression 22 (September 1999). 3, 6.

Scott, Charles. (2000). What's wrong with sports today? New Expression 23 (April 2000). 16.

Selfe, Cynthia, & Hawisher, Gail. (2004). Literate lives in the information age: Narratives of literacy from the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Selzer, Jack. (1983). The composing processes of an engineer. College Composition and Communication, 34, 178-87.

Shaughnessy, Mina. (1976). Diving in: An introduction to basic writing. College Composition and Communication, 3, 234-39.

Sheridan, Mary P. (2008). Girls, feminism, and grassroots literacies: Activism in the GirlZone. Albany: SUNY Press.

Shipka, Jody. (2005). A multi-modal task-based framework for composing. College Composition and Communication, 57, 277-306.

Shipka, Jody. (2010). “On the many forms it took throughout”: Engineering a multipart, multiple site rhetorical event. In Paul Prior & Julie Hengst (Eds.), Exploring semiotic remediation as discourse practice (pp. 52-76). Houndsmill, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.

Shipka, Jody. (2011). Toward a composition made whole. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.

Smit, David. (2004). The end of composition studies. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Sommers, Nancy. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication, 31, 378-388.

Spack, Ruth. (1997). The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language: A longitudinal case study. Written Communication, 14(1), 3-62.

Spinuzzi, Clay. (2003). Compound mediation in software development: Using genre ecologies to study textual artifacts. In C. Bazerman & D. R. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves, writing societies (pp. 97–124). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Mind, Culture, and Activity.

Springwood, Charles. (1996). Cooperstown to Dyersville: A geography of baseball nostalgia. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Stake, Robert. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stake, Robert. (2000). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435-454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stake, Robert. (2008). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed., pp. 119-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Sternglass, Marilyn. (1997). Time to know them: A longitudinal study of writing and learning at the college level. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Suchman, Lucy. (2000). Embodied practices of engineering work. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(1&2), 4-18.

Suits, Bernard. (1978). The grasshopper: Games, life, and utopia. Toronto: University of Toronto P.

Swales, John. (1996). Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 45-58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Syverson, Margaret A. (1999). The wealth of reality: An ecology of composition. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Tardy, Christine. (2009). Building genre knowledge. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.

Teston, Christa. (2012). Moving from artifact to action: A grounded investigation of visual displays of evidence during medical deliberations. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21(3), 187-209.

Tusting, Karin. (2010). Eruptions of interruptions: Managing tensions between writing and other tasks in a textualized childcare workplace. In D. Barton & U. Papen (Eds.), The anthropology of writing: Understanding textually-mediated worlds (pp. 67-89). London: Bloomsbury.

Urbanski, Heather. (Ed.). (2010). Writing and the digital generation: Essays on new media rhetoric. London: MacFarland.

Van Maanen, John. (1984). Doing new things in old ways: The chains of socialization. In J. L. Bess (Ed.), College and university organization (pp. 211-247). New York: New York University Press.

Varpio, Lara, Schryer, Catherine, Lehoux, Pascale, & Lingard, Lorelei. (2008). Working off the record: Physicians’ and nurses’ transformations of electronic patient record-based patient information. Academic Medicine, 81(10), s35-s39.

Vie, Stephanie. (2008). Digital divide 2.0: “Generation M” and online social networking sites in the composition classroom. Computers and Composition, 25, 9-23.

Vieria, Kate. (2011). Undocumented in a documentary society: Textual borders and transnational religious literacies. Written Communication, 28(4), 436-61.

Vinck, Dominique. (Ed.). (2003). Everyday engineering: An ethnography of design and innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Voloshinov, Valentin. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Trans. Ladislav Matejka and Irwin Titunik. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, Lev. (1987). Thinking and speech. (N. Minick, Ed. & Trans.). New York: Plenum.

Vygotsky, Lev. (1997). Problems of the theory and history of psychology. (R. van der Veer, Trans.). New York: Plenum.

Walvoord, Barbara E., & McCarthy, Lucille P. (1990). Thinking and writing in college: A naturalistic study of students in four disciplines. Urbana, IL: NCTE.

Wenger, Etienne. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wertsch, James V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.

Wertsch, James V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wickman, Chad. (2010). Writing material in chemical physics research: The laboratory notebook as locus of technical and textual integration. Written Communication, 27(3), 259-292.

Wilder, Laura. (2002). “Get comfortable with uncertainty”: A study of the conventional values of literary analysis in an undergraduate literature course. Written Communication, 19(1), 175-221.

Wilder, Laura. (2005). “The rhetoric of literary criticism” revisited: Mistaken critics, complex contexts, and social justice. Written Communication, 22(1), 76-119.

Winsor, Dorothy. (1996). Writing like an engineer: A rhetorical education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Winsor, Dorothy. (2003). Writing power: Communication in an engineering center. New York: SUNY Press.

Witte, Stephen. (1985). Revision, composing theory, and research design. In Sarah Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Revision and response (pp. 250-284). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Witte, Stephen P. (1992). Context, text, intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotic of writing. Written Communication, 9(2), 237-308.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.

Wortham, Stanford. (2006). Learning identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Warren, James. (2006). Literary scholars processing poetry and constructing arguments. Written Communication, 23, 202-226.

Yancey, Kathleen Blake. (2004). Made not only in words: Composition in a new key. College Composition and Communication, 56(2), 297–328.

Yancey, Kathleen, Robertson, Liane, & Taczak, K. (2014). Writing across contexts: Transfer, composition, and sites of writing. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

Yin, Robert K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

8.04 « PREVIOUS |

Computers and Composition Digital Press: An Imprint of Utah State University Press